地理学视角下的政策流动性研究进展与展望

郭杰; 杜志威; 张虹鸥; 汪坤

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2024.01.001

PDF(1214 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1) : 1-7. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2024.01.001

进展与动态

地理学视角下的政策流动性研究进展与展望

郭杰^1,2,3, 杜志威^1,2,3, 张虹鸥^1,2,3, 汪坤^1,2,3

作者信息 +

RESEARCH ON POLICY MOBILITY FROM A GEOGRAPHICAL PERSPECTIVE: PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS

GUO Jie^1,2,3, DU Zhi-wei^1,2,3, ZHANG Hong-ou^1,2,3, WANG Kun^1,2,3

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

在全球化日益加剧背景下，政策流动性已成为国际人文地理学的一个重要且前沿的话题，引起了政治经济学、后殖民主义和后结构主义学者的广泛关注，并产生了丰富的理论与实证研究。在对政治学“规范—理性”研究视角的批判基础上，地理学者先后采用“关系—建构”和“拓扑—拼装”视角对政策流动与变异、政策流动下的不均衡地理、政策流通的（权力）拓扑网络等问题展开探讨。本文梳理了政策流动性的三次研究视角的转向，总结不同视角下的核心议题、研究方法与视角局限。在此基础上，本文尝试提出流动性研究对重新思考全球化与地方发展、城市关系网络与不均衡地理发展等问题带来的启示，以期为未来国内学者开展相关议题研究提供理论参考。

Abstract

In the context of increasing globalization, policy mobility has become an important and cuttingedge topic in international human geography, attracting extensive attention from scholars of political economy, post-colonialism and post-structuralism, and generating a wealth of theoretical and empirical research. Based on the critique of the "normative-rational" perspective of political science, geographers have adopted the "relational-constructive" and "topological This paper explores the issues of policy mobility and variation, the uneven geography of policy mobility, and the topological network of policy circulation from a "relational-constructive" and "topological-assemblage" perspective. This paper compares the three shifts in research perspectives on policy mobility and summarizes the core issues, research methods and limitations of different perspectives. It is argued that the study of policy mobility provides both theoretical and methodological implications for rethinking local policy making, innovation diffusion and uneven geographical development in China. Future research should be strengthened in the following areas:(i) The relational, interplace, and cross-scale constructive processes of policy making and knowledge innovation, (ii) the relationship between the diffusion mechanism of policy innovation and geographically uneven development, and (iii) the relationship between territorial governance and policy making in China and the construction of a global policy community.

导出引用

郭杰, 杜志威, 张虹鸥, 汪坤. 地理学视角下的政策流动性研究进展与展望[J]. 人文地理. 2024, 39(1): 1-7 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2024.01.001

GUO Jie, DU Zhi-wei, ZHANG Hong-ou, WANG Kun. RESEARCH ON POLICY MOBILITY FROM A GEOGRAPHICAL PERSPECTIVE: PROGRESS AND PROSPECTS[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2024, 39(1): 1-7 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2024.01.001

中图分类号： K901

参考文献

[1] Dolowitz D, Marsh D.Learning from abroad:The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making[J].Governance, 2000,13(1):5-23.
[2] Shipan C, Volden C.Policy diffusion:Seven lessons for scholars and practitioners[J].Public Administration Review, 2012,72(6):788-796.
[3] Stone D.Transfer and translation of policy[J].Policy Studies, 2012, 33(6):483-499.
[4] James O, Lodge M.The limitations of "policy transfer" and "lesson drawing" for public policy research[J].Political Studies Review, 2003,1(2):179-193.
[5] Urry J.Sociology Beyond Societies:Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century[M].London:Routledge, 2000:1-2.
[6] Urry J.Connections[J].Environment and Planning D:Society and Space, 2004,22(1):27-37.
[7] 宋涛,刘卫东,高菠阳,等.合作伙伴关系视角下的海外园区政策移动性研究——以泰中罗勇工业园为例[J].地理学报,2020,75(6):1199-1209.[Song Tao, Liu Weidong, Gao Boyang, et al.Policy mobility of China's overseas industrial zones in the lens of partnership:A case study of Thai-Chinese Rayong industrial zone[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(6):1199-1209.]
[8] Peck J.Geographies of policy:From transfer-diffusion to mobilitymutation[J].Progress in Human Geography, 2011,35(6):773-797.
[9] McCann E, Ward K.Thinking through dualisms in urban policy mobilities[J].International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2015,39(4):828-830.
[10] 肖芸.政策转移研究的流动性转向——从国家中心到比较城市[J].社会学研究,2019,34(3):219-241.[Xiao Yun.The mobility turn in policy transfer studies:From national centers to comparative cities[J].Sociological Research, 2019,34(3):219-241.]
[11] Dolowitz D, Marsh D.Who learns what from whom? A review of the policy transfer literature[J].Political Studies, 1996,44(2):343-357.
[12] Rogers M.Diffusion of Innovation[M].New York:The Free Press, 1962:5-12.
[13] 陈芳.政策扩散、政策转移和政策趋同:基于概念、类型与发生机制的比较[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(6):8-16.[Chen Fang.Policy diffusion, policy transfer and policy converfence:A comparison based on conception, approach and mechanism[J].Journal of Xiamen University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2013(6):8-16].
[14] Wolman H.Policy Transfer:What We Know about What Transfers, How It Happens, and How to Do It[D].Washington:The George Washington University, 2009:2.
[15] Knill C.Introduction:Cross-national policy convergence:Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors[J].Journal of European Public Policy, 2005,12(5):764-774.
[16] Bennett C.What is policy convergence and what causes it?[J].British Journal of Political Science, 1991,21(2):215-233.
[17] Holinger K, Knill C.Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence[J].Journal of European Public Policy, 2005,12(5):775-796.
[18] Ladi S.Policy change and soft Europeanization:The transfer of the Ombudsman Institution to Greece, Cyprus and Malta[J].Public Administration, 2011,89(4):1643-1663.
[19] McCann E, Ward K.Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations:Toward a multidisciplinary conversation[J].Political Studies Review, 2012,10(3):325-332.
[20] Peck J, Theodore N.Exporting workfare/importing welfare-towork:Exploring the politics of third way policy transfer[J].Political Geography, 2001,20(2):427-460.
[21] Peck J, Theodore N.Mobilising policy models, methods and mutations[J].Geoforum, 2001,41(3):169-174.
[22] Temenos C, McCann E.Geographies of policy mobilities[J].Geography Compass, 2013,7(5):344-357.
[23] Temenos C, Baker T.Enriching urban policy mobilities research[J].International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2015,39(4):841-843.
[24] Ward K.Policies in motion, urban management and state restructuring:The trans-local expansion of business improvement districts[J].International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2006,30(1):54-75.
[25] Baker T, McCann E, Temenos C.Into the ordinary:Non-elite actors and the mobility of harm reduction policies[J].Policy and Society, 2020,39(1):129-145.
[26] Ward K.Entrepreneurial urbanism, policy tourism, and the making mobile of policies[M]//Bridge G, Watson S(eds.).The New Blackwell Companion to the City.Hoboken:Blackwell Publishing, 2012:726-737.
[27] McCann E.Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge:Toward a research agenda[J].Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2011,101(1):107-130.
[28] Andersson I, Cook I.Conferences, award ceremonies and the showcasing of ‘best practice’:A case study of the annual European week of regions and cities in Brussels[J].Environment and Planning C:Politics and Space, 2019,39(8):1361-1379.
[29] Robinson J.Cities in a word of cities:The comparative gesture[J].International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2011,35(1):1-23.
[30] Robinson J.Arriving at urban policies:The topological spaces of urban policy mobility[J].International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2016,39(4):831-834.
[31] McFarlane C.Learning the City:Knowledge and Translocal Assemblage[M].Chichester:Wiley-Blackwell, 2011:15-30.
[32] Wood A.Tracing policy movements:Methods for studying learning and policy circulation[J].Environment and Planning A, 2016, 48(2):391-406.
[33] McKenzie M.Affect theory and policy mobility:Challenges and possibilities for critical policy research[J].Critical Studies in Education, 2017,58(2):187-204.
[34] Borén T, Young C.Policy mobilities as informal processes:Evidence from "creative city" policy-making in Gdańsk and Stockholm[J].Urban Geography, 2021,42(4):551-569.
[35] Brenner N, Peck J, Theodore N.Variegated neoliberalization:Geographies, modalities, pathways[J].Global Networds, 2010,10(2):182-222.
[36] Peck J, Theodore N.Follow the policy:A distended case approach[J].Environment and Planning A, 2012,44(1):21-30.
[37] Clarke N.Urban policy mobility, anti-politics, and histories of the transnational municipal movement[J].Progress in Human Geography, 2012,36(1):25-43.
[38] Wood A.Multiple temporalities of policy circulation:Gradual, repetitive and delayed processes of BRT adoption in South African cities[J].International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2015,39(3):568-580.
[39] Mueller M, Schurr C.Assemblage thinking and actor network theory:Conjunctions, disjunctions, cross-fertilisations[J].Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2016,41(3):217-229.
[40] Prince R.Local or global policy? Thinking about policy mobility with assemblage and topology[J].Area, 2017,49(3):335-341.
[41] Ong A, Collier S.Global Assemblages:Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems[M].Malden:Blackwell, 2015:i-xiii.
[42] Cook I, Ward K.Trans-urban networks of learning, mega events and policy tourism:The case of Manchester's commonwealth and Olympic Games projects[J].Urban Studies, 2011,48(12):2519-2535.
[43] Jacobs J.Urban geographies I:Still thinking cities relationally[J].Progress in Human Geography, 2012,36(3):412-422.
[44] Cohen D.Grounding mobile policies:Ad hoc networks and the creative city in Bandung[J].Indonesia Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 2015,36(1):23-37.
[45] Pow C.License to travel:Policy assemblage and the ‘Singapore model’[J].City, 2014,18(3):287-306.
[46] Allen J, Cochrane A.Assemblages of state power:Topological shifts in the organization of government and politics[J].Antipode, 2010,42(5):1071-1089.
[47] Farias I, Bender T.Urban Assemblages:How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies[M].London:Routledge, 2010:16.
[48] Prince R.The spaces in between:Mobile policy and the topographies and topologies of the technocracy[J].Environment and Planning C, 2015,34(3):420-437.