行动者网络视角下旅游景观的再思：理论源流、概念内涵与研究理路

袁超; 徐林增

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.03.018

PDF(1526 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3) : 175-183. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.03.018

旅游

行动者网络视角下旅游景观的再思：理论源流、概念内涵与研究理路

袁超¹, 徐林增²

作者信息 +

RETHINKING TOURISMSCAPES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ACTOR-NETWORK THEORY: THEORETICAL ORIGIN, CONCEPTUAL CONNOTATION AND RESEARCH PATHWAY

YUAN Chao¹, XU Lin-zeng²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

行动者网络理论（ANT）作为一种突破以往基于结构主义思考旅游现象的思维方式，对于深入理解旅游活动的运作、组织和展演，迈向“新旅游研究”具有重要意义。与国外旅游研究相比，ANT在国内旅游研究中的理论对话与议题广泛性方面，仍具较大探索空间。为此，文章以旅游景观（Tourismscapes）作为衔接ANT与旅游研究的中介概念，系统梳理旅游景观的理论源流、概念内涵与研究理路。具体而言，文章首先阐述对称性原则、非还原、行动者网络、转译与旅游景观的关系。其次，从界定、边界与特点，秩序模式，空间逻辑剖析旅游景观的概念内涵。再次，以目的地为例，援引中世纪中心案例，阐述旅游景观下目的地经验研究的理路方向。最后，文章解析旅游景观作为范式的研究取向、聚焦重点与探索议题。文章以期深化对旅游现象秩序化、物质性与多重性的再认识，提供另一种理解旅游实践的认知方式，助推旅游研究实现范式创新与知识溢出的可能性。

Abstract

Originating from the sociology of science and technology, the actor- network theory(ANT) has received continuous attention from many disciplines. Compared with foreign tourism research, ANT still has a lot of room for exploration in terms of theoretical dialogue and wide range of topics in domestic tourism research. Based on this, this paper takes tourismscapes as an intermediary concept connecting ANT and tourism research, and systematically sorts out the theoretical origins, conceptual connotation and empirical research pathway of tourismscapes. Specifically, the article first elaborates on the concepts of symmetry, nonreduction, actor networks, and translation, and briefly introduces how these concepts relate to tourismscapes research. Secondly, the research orientation of tourismscapes is analyzed from the definition, boundary and characteristics, modes of ordering and spatial logic, which responds to the current empirical research to a certain extent. Thirdly, taking the destination as an example, this paper cites the case of the medieval center in Nykøbing Falster to illustrate research pathway of the empirical research of the destination under the tourismscapes. Finally, this paper analyzes the research orientation, focus and exploration topics of tourismscapes as a paradigm.

导出引用

袁超, 徐林增. 行动者网络视角下旅游景观的再思：理论源流、概念内涵与研究理路[J]. 人文地理. 2025, 40(3): 175-183 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.03.018

YUAN Chao, XU Lin-zeng. RETHINKING TOURISMSCAPES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF ACTOR-NETWORK THEORY: THEORETICAL ORIGIN, CONCEPTUAL CONNOTATION AND RESEARCH PATHWAY[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2025, 40(3): 175-183 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.03.018

中图分类号： K901.6

参考文献

[1] Franklin A, Crang M. The trouble with tourism and travel theory? [J]. Tourist Studies, 2001,1(1):5-22.
[2] 杨效忠,严星雨.生命哲学视野下旅游研究与实践方向的探索[J]. 人文地理,2022,37(3):1-6,162. [Yang Xiaozhong, Yan Xingyu. Exploration on the direction of tourism research and practice from the perspective of life philosophy[J]. Human Geography, 2022,37(3):1- 6,162.]
[3] Morris M. Banality in cultural studies[J]. Discourse: Journal for Theoretical Studies in Media and Culture, 1988,10(2):3-29.
[4] Ren C. (Staying with) the trouble with tourism and travel theory?[J]. Tourist Studies, 2021,21(1):133-140.
[5] Franklin A. Tourism as an ordering: Towards a new ontology of tourism[J]. Tourist Studies, 2004,4(3):277-301.
[6] Tribe J. New tourism research[J]. Tourism Recreation Research, 2005,30(2):5-8.
[7] Emirbayer M. Manifesto for a relational sociology[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1997,103(2):281-317.
[8] Jóhannesson G T, Bærenholdt J O. Actor-network theory/network geographies[M] //Kitchin R, Thrift N. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Oxford: Elsevier, 2009:15-19.
[9] Jóhannesson G T. Tourism translations: Actor-network theory and tourism research[J]. Tourist Studies, 2005,5(2):133-150.
[10] Cloke P, Perkins H C. Cetacean performance and tourism in Kaikoura, New Zealand[J]. Environment and Planning D, 2005, 23(6): 903-924.
[11] Van Der Duim R, Ren C, Jóhannesson G T. ANT: A decade of interfering with tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2017, 64(5): 139-149.
[12] Van Der Duim R. Tourismscapes an actor-network perspective[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2007,34(4):961-976.
[13] Van Der Duim R, Ren C, Thór Jóhannesson G. Ordering, materiality, and multiplicity: Enacting Actor-Network Theory in tourism[J]. Tourist Studies, 2013,13(1):3-20.
[14] Stinson M J, Hurst C E, Grimwood B S R. Tracing the materiality of reconciliation in tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2022, 94:103380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2022.103380.
[15] 朱峰,保继刚,项怡娴.行动者网络理论（ANT）与旅游研究范式创新[J]. 旅游学刊, 2012,27(11):24-31. [Zhu Feng, Bao Jigang, Xiang Yixian. Actor-network-theory (ANT) and paradigm innovation for tourism research[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2012,27(11):24-31.]
[16] 李立华,付涤非,刘睿.旅游研究的空间转向——行动者网络理论视角的旅游研究述评[J]. 旅游学刊,2014,29(3):107-115. [Li Lihua, Fu Difei, Liu Rui. Spatial Turn of tourism studies: A review on tourism studies from the perspective of the actor-network theory[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2014,29(3):107-115.]
[17] 汪秀琼,黄安琪,梁肖梅,等.旅游研究中的行动者网络理论：应用进展及发展建议——以2000—2021年的文献为例[J]. 旅游导刊, 2022,6(5):69-92. [Wang Xiuqiong, Huang Anqi, Liang Xiaomei, et al. Actor-network theory in tourism research over the last two decades: Progress and prospects[J]. Tourism and Hospitality Prospects, 2022,6(5):69-92.]
[18] 刘宣,王小依.行动者网络理论在人文地理领域应用研究述评[J]. 地理科学进展,2013,32(7):1139-1147. [Liu Xuan, Wang Xiaoyi. A review on the application of actor network theory to human geography[J]. Progress in Geography, 2013,32(7):1139-1147.]
[19] 王鹏飞,王瑞璠.行动者网络理论与农村空间商品化——以北京市麻峪房村乡村旅游为例[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(8):1408-1418. [Wang Pengfei,Wang Ruifan. Actor network theory and commodification in rural space: A case study of Mayufang village in Beijing [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(8):1408-1418.]
[20] 张环宙,周永广,魏蕙雅,等.基于行动者网络理论的乡村旅游内生式发展的实证研究——以浙江浦江仙华山村为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2008,23(2):65-71. [Zhang Huanzhou, Zhou Yongguang, Wei Huiya, et al. An empirical study of rural tourism endogenous development based on actor-network theory: A case of Xianhuashan village, Pujiang county, Zhejiang province[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2008,23(2):65- 71.]
[21] 杨忍,徐茜,周敬东,等.基于行动者网络理论的逢简村传统村落空间转型机制解析[J]. 地理科学,2018,38(11):1817-1827. [Yang Ren, Xu Qian, Zhou Jingdong, et al. Mechanism of rural space transformation in Fengjian acient village of Shunde district, Foshan based on the actor network[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(11): 1817-1827.]
[22] 谭华云,周国华.基于行动者网络理论的乡村绅士化演化过程与机制解析——以广西巴马盘阳河流域为例[J]. 地理学报,2022,77(4):869- 887. [Tan Huayun, Zhou Guohua. Evolution process and mechanism of rural gentrification based on actor-network theory: A case study of Panyang River basin of Bama county,Guangxi[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022,77(4):869-887.]
[23] 王勇,朱雅琴. 行动者网络视角下江南水乡古镇空间演化路径——以周庄古镇为例[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(6): 76-84. [Wang Yong，Zhu Yaqin. The spatial evolution path of ancient water towns in southern Yangtze River based on the actor-network perspective: A case study of Zhouzhuang ancient town[J]. Human Geography, 2020,35(6):76-84.]
[24] 王伟,乔家君,程遂营,等.基于行动者网络理论的重渡旅游专业村集聚演化机制[J]. 人文地理,2023,38(2):155-163,180. [Wang Wei, Qiao Jiajun, Cheng Suiying, et al. An analysis of the evolution mechanism of Chongdu tourism village cluster based on the theory of actor network[J]. Human Geography, 2023,38(2):155-163,180.]
[25] 袁超,陈品宇,孔翔,等.行动者网络理论与人文地理学的交互关系研究——重构、争辩与反思[J]. 地理研究,2021,40(2):583-596. [Yuan Chao, Chen Pinyu, Kong Xiang, et al. Research on the interaction between actor-network theory and human geography: Reconstruction, debate and reflection[J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(2):583-596.]
[26] Kothari C R. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (2ed)[M]. New Delhi: New Age International Ltd, 2004:1-23.
[27] Van Der Duim R. Tourismscapes[D]. Wageningen: Wageningen University, 2005:75-145.
[28] 董培海,李伟.建构与批判：国内旅游研究中的哲学视角反思[J]. 旅游科学,2019,33(4):1-12. [Dong Peihai, Li Wei. Construction and criticism: Reflections on the philosophical perspective in domestic tourism studies[J]. Tourism Science, 2019,33(4):1-12.]
[29] 汤茂林. 文化景观的内涵及其研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2000, 19(1):70-79. [Tang Maolin. The inventory and progress of cultural la- ndscape study[J]. Progress in Geography, 2000,19(1):70-79.]
[30] Law J. After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology[J]. The Sociological Review, 1999,47(S1):1-14.
[31] Law J. Organizing Modernity[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994:103-110.
[32] Franklin A. Tourism: An Introduction[M]. London: SAGE Publications, 2003:279.
[33] Murdoch J. Towards a geography of heterogeneous associations[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 1997,21(3):321-337.
[34] Ashworth G, Dietvorst A. Tourism and Spatial Transformations: Implications for Policy and Planning[M]. Oxon: CABI, 1995:1-12.
[35] Pels D, Hetherington K, Vandenberghe F. The status of the object: Performances, mediations, and techniques[J]. Theory, Culture & Society, 2002,19(5/6):1-27.
[36] 谢彦君.旅游的本质及其认识方法——从学科自觉的角度看[J]. 旅游学刊,2010,25(1):26-31. [Xie Yanjun. On the essence of tourism and its way of coginition: Viewing from the perspective of the discipline itself [J]. Tourism Tribune, 2010,25(1):26-31.]
[37] 曹诗图,曹国新,邓苏.对旅游本质的哲学辨析[J]. 旅游科学,2011, 25(1): 80-87. [Cao Shitu, Cao Guoxin, Deng Su. A philosophical analysis of the essence of tour[J]. Tourism Science, 2011,25(1):80- 87.]
[38] Murdoch J. Ecologising sociology: Actor-network theory, coconstruction and the problem of human exemptionalism[J]. Sociology, 2001,35(1):111-133.
[39] Callon M, Law J. Agency and the hybrid collectif [J]. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 1995,94(2):481-507.
[40] Callon M. Actor-network theory[M] //Baltes P B, Smelser N J. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd, 2001:63.
[41] Murdoch J. The spaces of actor-network theory[J]. Geoforum, 1998, 29(4):357-374.
[42] Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay[J]. The Sociological Review, 1984,32(Sl):196-233.
[43] Verschoor G M. Tacos, Tiendas and Mezcal: An Actor-network Perspective on Small-scale Entrepreneurial Projects in Western Mexico [D]. Wageningen: Wageningen University, 1997:35.
[44] Castells M. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Volume I: The Rise of the Network Society[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2000:501.
[45] Urry J. Global Complexity[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2003:26- 28.
[46] Ploeg J D. The Virtual Framer: Past, Present and Future of the Dutch Peasantry[M]. Assen: Van Gorcum, 2003:111-137.
[47] Clegg S. From Frameworks of Power[M]. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 1997:149-186.
[48] Meethan K. Tourism in Global Society: Place, Culture, Consumption[M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001:128.
[49] Reisinger Y, Steiner C J. Reconceptualizing object authenticity[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2006,33(1):65-86.
[50] Hetherington K, Lee N. Social order and the blank figure[J]. Environment and Planning D, 2000,18(2):169-184.
[51] Murdoch J. Post-structuralist Geography: A Guide to Relational Space[M]. London: SAGE, 2006:78-102.
[52] Nguyen T Q T, Young T, Johnson P, et al. Conceptualising networks in sustainable tourism development[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2019, 32:100575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100575.
[53] Bærenholdt J O. Enacting destinations: The politics of absence and presence[M] //Van Der Duim R, Ren C, Jóhannesson G T. ActorNetwork Theory and Tourism. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012:111-127.
[54] Saarinen J. 'Destinations in change': The transformation process of tourist destinations[J]. Tourist Studies, 2005,4(2):161-179.
[55] Hannam K, Sheller M, Urry J. Editorial: Mobilities, immobilities and moorings[J]. Mobilities, 2006,1(1):1-22.
[56] Aigfaí. Destinations as virtual objects of tourist communication [M] //Van Der Duim R, Ren C, Jóhannesson G T. Actor-Network Theory and Tourism. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012:128-145.
[57] Bærenholdt J O, Haldrup M. On the track of the Vikings[M] // Sheller M, Urry A J. Tourism Mobilities: Places to Play, Places in Play. London: Routledge, 2004:78-89.
[58] Ren C. Assembling the socio-material destination: An actornetwork approach to cultural tourism studies[M] //Munsters G R A W. Cultural Tourism Research Methods. Oxon: CABI, 2010: 199- 208.
[59] Haldrup M, Larsen J. The family gaze[J]. Tourist Studies, 2003, 3(1):23-46.
[60] Mol A, Law J. Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology[J]. Social Studies of Science, 1994,24(4):641-671.
[61] 齐君,董玉萍,提姆·汤森. 可供性理论在西方环境规划设计中的应用与发展[J]. 国际城市规划,2019,34(6):100-107,14. [Qi Jun, Dong Yuping, Tim Townshend. Application and development of affordance theory in western environmental planning and design[J]. Urban Planning International, 2019,34(6):100-107,14.]
[62] Xin S, Tribe J, Chambers D. Conceptual research in tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2013,41(4):66-88.
[63] Law J, Singleton V. Object lessons[J]. Organization (London, England), 2005,12(3):331-355.
[64] Bao J, Chen G, Ma L. Tourism research in China: Insights from insiders[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2014,45(3):167-181.
[65] Ren C, Pritchard A, Morgan N. Constructing tourism research: A critical inquiry[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2010, 37(4): 885- 904.
[66] Farias I, Bender T. Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies[M]. Oxon: Routledge, 2010:1-24.
[67] Park K, Park S, Lee T J. Analysis of a spatial network from the perspective of actor-network theory[J]. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2020,22(5):653-665.
[68] 刘怀玉《. 空间的生产》若干问题研究[J]. 哲学动态,2014(11):18- 28. [Liu Huaiyu. Review of studies of certain problems in the production of space[J]. Philosophical Trends, 2014(11):18-28.]
[69] Huijbens E H, Jóhannesson G T. Tending to destinations: Conceptualising tourism's transformative capacities[J]. Tourist Studies, 2019, 19(3):279-294.
[70] 王瑶.乡村的社会—物质拼装：开启乡村研究的新视角[J]. 人文地理, 2023,38(2):145-154. [Wang Yao. Rural socio-material assemblages： A new perspective for rural studies[J]. Human Geography, 2023,38(2): 145-154.]