关键地缘体视角下美国“印太战略”在孟加拉国地缘政治想象研究

张良兵; 骆华松; 洪菊花; 陆好健; 周美岐

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.04.016

PDF(7764 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4) : 159-170. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.04.016

政治

关键地缘体视角下美国“印太战略”在孟加拉国地缘政治想象研究

张良兵^1,2, 骆华松^1,2,3, 洪菊花^1,3, 陆好健⁴, 周美岐¹

作者信息 +

RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF THE UNITED STATES' INDO-PACIFIC STRATEGY ON BANGLADESH'S GEOPOLITICAL IMAGINATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF KEY GEOPOLITICAL ENTITIES

ZHANG Liang-bing^1,2, LUO Hua-song^1,2,3, HONG Ju-hua^1,3, LU Hao-jian⁴, ZHOU Mei-qi¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

援引地缘政治想象的理念与机器学习分析方法，对关键地缘体——中美印孟等国的主流新闻媒体文本，从认知、动机和情感三方面解读2018—2023年美国“印太战略”在孟加拉国地缘政治想象。研究发现：美国“印太战略”在孟加拉国地缘政治想象中，①空间关联存在着两点偏差：一是美国同孟加拉国空间关联性存在偏差；二是空间关联密度存在偏差；②关键地缘体的情感下降；③孟加拉国两点认知偏差：一是对美国“印太战略”的地缘认知偏差；二是对地缘身份的认知偏差。④孟加拉国两种态度缺失：一是对南亚、东南亚周边国家态度的缺失；二是对主动性态度表达的缺失。因此，中国需准确把握“印太战略”和美国对孟加拉国安全政策的实质，建立完善的沟通机制以管控潜在危机，避免出现误判。

Abstract

In recent years, with the continuous advancement of the U.S. "Indo-Pacific Strategy," Bangladesh's geopolitical value has become increasingly prominent within the framework of this strategy. Drawing on the concept of geopolitical imagination and machine learning analysis methods, this paper interprets the geopolitical imagination of Bangladesh regarding the U.S. "Indo-Pacific Strategy" from 2018 to 2023, through the examination of text from mainstream news media outlets in China, the United States, India, and Bangladesh, focusing on cognition, motivation, and emotion from key geopolitical entities. The research finds that in Bangladesh's geopolitical imagination of the U.S. "Indo-Pacific Strategy":1) There are two deviations in spatial relevance: first, there is a deviation in the spatial correlation between United States and Bangladesh; second, there is a deviation in the spatial correlation density.2) There is a decline in the sentiments of key geopolitical entities.3) Bangladesh exhibits two cognitive biases: Firstly, a geopolitical cognitive bias towards the U.S. "Indo-Pacific Strategy"; secondly,cognitive biases about geographical identity.4) Bangladesh lacks two types of attitudes: Firstly, a lack of clear attitudes towards neighboring countries in South Asia and Southeast Asia; secondly, a lack of expression of proactive attitudes.

导出引用

张良兵, 骆华松, 洪菊花, 陆好健, 周美岐. 关键地缘体视角下美国“印太战略”在孟加拉国地缘政治想象研究[J]. 人文地理. 2025, 40(4): 159-170 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.04.016

ZHANG Liang-bing, LUO Hua-song, HONG Ju-hua, LU Hao-jian, ZHOU Mei-qi. RESEARCH ON THE IMPACT OF THE UNITED STATES' INDO-PACIFIC STRATEGY ON BANGLADESH'S GEOPOLITICAL IMAGINATION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF KEY GEOPOLITICAL ENTITIES[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2025, 40(4): 159-170 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.04.016

中图分类号： K901

参考文献

[1] 肖欢". 印太"视角下澳大利亚军事战略的调整与变化[J].区域与全球发展,2019,3(6):20-28,154.[Xiao Huan. Adjustments and changes of Australia's military strategy from the Indo-Pacific perspective[J]. Regional and Global Development, 2019,3(6):20-28,154.]
[2] 张腾军.欧美"印太战略"之比较及其互动前景分析[J].法国研究, 2022(1):69-87.[Zhang Tengjun. Comparison of "Indo-Pacific strategy" and interaction prospect analysis between Europe and the United States[J]. France Studies, 2022(1):69-87.]
[3] 鲍志鹏.当前美国"印太战略"的内外困境[J].军事文摘,2022(13):11-14.[Bao Zhipeng. The current internal and external dilemmas of the "Indo-Pacific Strategy" of United States[J]. Military Digest, 2022(13):11-14.]
[4] Haldar S. Bangladesh in Indias maritime strategy towards the Bay of Bengal:Towards a comprehensive Indo-Pacific outlook[J]. Maritime Affairs:Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 2022,18(2):1-14.
[5] 王娟娟.美国"印太战略"在孟加拉国的实践与孟加拉国的回应及其逻辑[J]. 印度洋经济体研究,2022(4):89-113.[Wang Juanjuan. The practice of United States's "Indo-Pacific Strategy" in Bangladesh and Bangladesh's response and its logic[J]. India Ocean Economic Research, 2022(4):89-113.]
[6] 张潇予.孟加拉国多元平衡外交的历史向度,现实考量与前景展望[J]. 南亚东南亚研究,2023(3):111-125,157.[Zhang Xiaoyu. The pluralistic and balanced diplomacy of Bangladesh:Historical dimension, realistic consideration and prospects[J]. South and Southeast Asian Studies, 2023(3):111-125,157.]
[7] 张晶,刘建忠.地缘体概念内涵及特征研究[J].世界地理研究,2014, 23(4):50-55.[Zhang Jing, Liu Jianzhong. Research on attribute and concept of geo-entity[J]. World Geography Research, 2014, 23(4):50-55.]
[8] 苏尼尔·阿姆瑞斯.横渡孟加拉湾:自然的暴怒和移民的财富[M]. 杭州:浙江人民出版社,2020:19-20.[Sunil Amrith. Crossing the Bay of Bengal:Nature's Fury and the Wealth of Immigrants[M]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang People's Publishing House, 2020:19-20.]
[9] 韦宗友.拜登政府"印太战略"及其对亚太秩序的影响[J].当代美国评论,2022,6(2):44-60,124.[Wei Zongyou. The Biden administration's "Indo-Pacific Strategy" and its impact on the Asia-Pacific order[J]. Contemporary United States Review, 2022,6(2):44-60,124.]
[10] 万佳.同盟化视域下印度的"印太战略"[D].武汉:武汉大学,2023:69.[Wan Jia. India's "Indo-Pacific Strategy" from the Perspective Of Alliance[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University, 2023:69.]
[11] 冯立冰,连昌惠.南亚小国的战略对冲与中国的南亚地区政策选择[J].外交评论,2022,39(4):87-109,6-7.[Feng Libing, Lian Changhui. Strategic hedging of small countries in South Asia and China's policy choice in South Asia[J]. Foreign Affairs Review, 2022,39(4):87-109,6-7.]
[12] 胡志丁,张喆,赵路平.地缘环境研究的理念及议程与路径[J].地理学报,2023,78(1):198-213.[Hu Zhiding, Zhang Zhe, Zhao Luping. Geo-setting research:Idea, agenda and approaches, 2023,78(1):198-213.]
[13] 富宁宁,牛福长,葛岳静,等.大国战略交汇区小国地缘环境及其对冲战略响应:以菲律宾与中美为例[J].地理研究,2024,43(7):1627-1643.[Fu Ningning, Niu Fuchang, Ge Yuejing, et al. Geo-setting and hedging strategy responses of small states in an area of strategic intersection:A case study of the Philippines, China, and the United States[J]. Geographical Research, 2024,43(7):1627-1643.]
[14] 段雪松,胡志丁,牛福长.缅甸地缘环境变化与中缅印度洋新通道建设研究[J]. 热带地理,2024,44(7):1149-1160.[Duan Xuesong, Hu Zhiding, Niu Fuchang. Study on changes in Myanmar's geopolitical landscape and the construction of China-Myanmar Indian Ocean New Corridor[J]. Tropical Geography, 2024,44(7):1149-1160.]
[15] 王萍,杜德斌,胡志丁.约旦河跨境水冲突的地缘环境研究[J].地理学报,2023,78(1):214-229.[Wang Ping, Du Debin, Hu Zhiding. The geo-setting of transboundary water conflicts of the Jordan River[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2023,78(1):214-229.]
[16] 叶帅,胡志丁,葛岳静,等.地缘战略交汇区类属的国别地缘环境解析:以乌克兰为例[J].地理研究,2021,40(9):2591-2605.[Ye Shuai, Hu Zhiding, Ge Yuejing, et al. Analysis on the national geo-setting of geo-strategic intersection area:Take Ukraine as an example[J]. Geographical Research, 2021,40(9):2591-2605.]
[17] Farinelli F. Friedrich Ratzel and the nature of (political) geography[J]. Political Geography, 2000,40(9):36.
[18] Hepple L W. The revival of geopolitics[J]. Political Geography Quarterly, 1986,5(4):21-36.
[19] 葛汉文. 岛链、空间控制与霸权:美国对西太平洋地区的地缘政治想象[J]. 国际展望,2020,12(3):63-79,155-156.[Ge Hanwen. Island chain, space control and hegemony United States's geopolitical imagination of the Western Pacific[J]. International Outlook, 2020,12(3):63-79,155-156.]
[20] Tuathail G Ó, Agnew J. Geopolitics and discourse:Practical geopolitical reasoning in American foreign policy[J]. Political Geography, 1992,11(2):190-204.
[21] Dodds K. Political geography III:Critical geopolitics after ten years[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2001,25(3):469-484.
[22] 胡志丁,赵玉洁,赵路平.地缘政治学诞生的时代背景与创建的学理基础[J]. 地理研究,2024,43(2):505-518.[Hu Zhiding, Zhao Yujie, Zhao Luping. The historical context and theoretical foundations for the emergence of geopolitics[J]. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(2):505-518.]
[23] Tuathail Gearóid Ó. General introduction:Thinking critically about geopolitics[J]. The Geopolitics Reader, 2006:1-14.
[24] Dalby S, Tuathail G O U. Rethinking Geopolitics[M]. London:Routledge, 1998:17-19.
[25] 安宁.津巴布韦对中国国家形象的动态地理想象:基于批判地缘政治理论的分析[J]. 地理学报,2022,77(6):1518-1530.[An Ning. Zimbabwe's dynamic geographical imaginations of China's national image:Perspective from critical geopolitics[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022,77(6):1518-1530.]
[26] 李卫东,李宁.他者想象与自我认知:中美民众国家形象认知研究[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2020,22(6):153-163.[Li Weidong, Li Ning. Otherness Imagination and Self Perception:A study on the image cognition of people's state in China and the United States[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences), 2020,22(6):153-163.]
[27] 洪菊花,骆华松.区域合作与地缘安全复合系统结构与功能研究:以澜湄合作与孟中印缅经济走廊对比分析为例[J]. 云南地理环境研究,2020,32(2):1-7,27.[Hong Juhua, Luo Huasong. Research on the structure and function of the composite system of regional cooperation and geopolitical security:A comparative analysis of the Lancang-Mekong Cooperation and the Bangladesh-China-IndiaMyanmar Economic Corridor[J]. Yunnan Geographical Environment Research, 2020,32(2):1-7,27.]
[28] Komorita S S. Interpersonal relations:Mixed-motive interaction[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1995,46:183-207.
[29] Forgas J P, George J M. Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations:An information procession perspective[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2001,86:3-34
[30] 李岩梅,刘长江,李纾.认知、动机、情感因素对谈判行为的影响[J]. 心理科学进展,2007(3):511-517.[Li Yanmei, Liu Changjiang, Li Shu. Influence of cognitive, motivational and emotional factors on negotiation behavior[J]. Progress in Psychological Science, 2007(3):511-517.]
[31] 孙吉胜.国际关系中语言与意义的建构:伊拉克战争解析[J].世界经济与政治, 2009(5):47.[Sun Jisheng. The construction of language and meaning in international relations:Analysis of the Iraq war[J]. World Economics and Politics, 2009(5):47.]
[32] Morgenthaler S. Exploratory data analysis[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics, 2010,1(1):33-44.
[33] Koltko-Rivera, Mark E. Rediscovering the later version of Maslow's hierarchy of needs:Self-transcendence and opportunities for theory, research, and unification[J]. Review of General Psychology, 2006,10(4):302-317.
[34] 韦宗友.美国印太战略演变趋势及影响评估[J].人民论坛·学术前沿, 2021,1(5):92-100.[Wei Zongyou. Indo-Pacific strategy evolution trend and impact assessment of United States[J]. People's Forum Academic Frontiers, 2021,1(5):92-100.]
[35] Chang H, Sapatnekar S S. Statistical timing analysis under spatial correlations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 2005,24(9):1467-1482.