PDF(13804 KB)
PDF(13804 KB)
时空行为视角下幸福感的地理学研究
A GEOGRAPHICAL STUDIES OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING FROM A SPACE-TIME BEHAVIOR APPROACH
传统地理学在幸福感研究中长期关注空间异质性特征及其地理环境作用机制,但基于静态邻里效应的研究范式存在显著局限性,特别是忽视了个体空间移动性对地理环境暴露的动态影响。本文首先系统梳理了幸福感的概念和测度方法,从学科发展史视角阐释了地理学介入幸福感研究的理论渊源,系统梳理了地理学的幸福感研究重点。其次,基于哲学与方法论革新,提出地理学幸福感研究的时空行为范式转向路径:从静态区位分析转向动态行为追踪,从环境决定论转向人地互动论,从截面研究转向过程研究。在此基础上,构建了基于时—空—人耦合的幸福感地理学研究框架,并从理论构建、机制挖掘、场景应用三个维度展望未来研究方向,为构建可感知、可量化的幸福城市评估体系提供理论支撑,以期为幸福城市政策制定和精细化城市治理提供参考。
Traditional geography has long focused on spatial heterogeneity characteristics and the mechanisms of geographic environmental effects in subjective well-being research. However, the research paradigm based on static neighborhood effects has significant limitations, particularly in neglecting the dynamic impact of individual spatial mobility on geographic environmental exposure. This paper first systematically reviews the concepts and measurement methods of subjective well-being, elucidates the theoretical origins of geography's involvement in subjective well-being research from the perspective of disciplinary development history, and critiques studies on the relationship between geographic environments and subjective well-being. Secondly, based on philosophical and methodological innovations, it proposes a shift in the paradigm of geographic subjective well-being research towards spatiotemporal behavior. That is, from static locational analysis to dynamic behavioral tracking, from environmental determinism to human-environment interaction theory, and from cross-sectional studies to process research. Thirdly, the paper constructs a geographic research framework for subjective well-being based on the coupling of time, space, and human behavior. It also outlines future research directions from three dimensions of theoretical construction, pattern and mechanism mining, and innovative application scenarios. This provides theoretical support for building a perceptible and quantifiable evaluation system for happy cities, aiming to offer references for the formulation of happy city policies and refined urban governance.
subjective well-being / spatiotemporal behavior / geographical context / mobility
| 1 |
王丰龙, 王冬根. 主观幸福感度量研究进展及其对智慧城市建设的启示[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34 (4): 482- 493.
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
马静, 刘冠秋, 饶婧雯. 地理环境与时空行为对主观幸福感的影响研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41 (4): 718- 730.
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
齐兰兰, 周素红, 闫小培. 世界视野下的中国民众幸福感状况及其影响因素[J]. 世界地理研究, 2013, 22 (2): 140- 150.
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
苏玲玲, 周素红, 张雪, 等. 社区环境对居民主观幸福感的影响: 时间维度的作用[J]. 城市发展研究, 2019, 26 (9): 26- 34.
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
程晗蓓, 李志刚. 邻里变迁影响城市居民健康的国际研究进展与启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2022, 37 (5): 98- 106.
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
塔娜, 柴彦威, 关美宝. 北京郊区居民日常生活方式的行为测度与空间—行为互动[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70 (8): 1271- 1280.
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
刘晔, 何嘉锐, 王若宇, 李志刚. 城市绿色空间对心理健康的影响: 研究进展与展望[J]. 热带地理, 2023, 43 (9): 1747- 1759.
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
陶印华, 柴彦威, 杨婕. 城市居民健康生活方式研究的时空行为视角[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36 (1): 22- 29.
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
王丰龙. 幸福地理学研究中的时空间尺度陷阱[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36 (2): 11- 19.
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
林荣平, 周素红. 基于移动式监测的道路PM2.5浓度精细化时空模拟[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78 (1): 149- 162.
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
王丰龙. 行为地理学的学科特色与拓展路径[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41 (1): 16- 26.
|
| 71 |
许伟麟, 柴彦威. 移动性地理学视角下时空间行为研究创新[J]. 地理学报, 2023, 78 (4): 1015- 1027.
|
| 72 |
柴彦威, 谭一洺, 申悦, 等. 空间—行为互动理论构建的基本思路[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36 (10): 1959- 1970.
|
| 73 |
柴彦威, KajsaEllegård, 张艳. "新"时间地理学专栏导言[J]. 人文地理, 2016, 31 (5): 17-18, 31.
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
周素红, 柴彦威, 关美宝, 等. 中国行为地理学的理论与方法研究前沿[J]. 地理研究, 2024, 43 (9): 2235- 2258.
|
| 77 |
周素红, 郑重. 基于时-空-人耦合的城市时空行为景观: 理论构建与应用研究[J]. 地理研究, 2024, 43 (9): 2271- 2283.
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |