新文化地理学视角下景观研究综述与展望

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.01.004

PDF(1529 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1) : 23-28,98. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.01.004

进展与动态

新文化地理学视角下景观研究综述与展望

李倩菁^1,2, 蔡晓梅^1,2

作者信息 +

LITERATURE REVIEWAND ANALYSIS ON LANDSCAPE RESEARCH FROM PERSPECTIVE OF NEWCULTURAL GEOGRAPHY

LI Qian-jing^1,2, CAI Xiao-mei^1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

景观意义一方面要对其符号化的表征元素进行解读，另一方面也要关注其不可表征的意义。本研究梳理了国外新文化地理学视角下的景观研究，发现： ①表征视角下，一方面景观既被看作文化的产物，又是不同时期文化的再生；另一方面景观在权力博弈中曲折发展并推动其象征性意义的演变。②非表征视角主要关注日常生活行为、情感等方面所反应的社会变迁以及所感知的多元、复杂与不稳定的景观意义。国内新文化地理学视角的景观研究在西方思潮的影响下，对一些具体案例进行了尝试性研究，取得了一定的成果。本研究有助于中国学者结合转型期中国政治、经济、文化背景，构建具有中国特色的新文化地理学景观理论体系，推动新文化地理学在中国的良性发展。

Abstract

With the development of new cultural geography, space and landscape are not limited to the "container" of culture, but the important force in the production of culture. The symbol in the landscape is material and visible, with its ideology, which means the result of long-term accumulation and action of the landscape in the context of the situation. Feelings, emotions, behavior, ideas, and so on, which hiding behind the representative unable to figurative, are also the important part of landscape but can't be read. These cannot be symbolic practice is rooted in historical, social, cultural and political background of the landscape, with a deep imprint of the geography, also due to the randomicity and subjectivity, practice can often more sensitive to reflect the changes in the landscape and its significance. So when we study landscape, we should focus on both symbolic representation and non-representational meaning. Western scholars have studied the system and theory of landscape. Through the review of theory and practice study, this study traces both representational and non-representational study of landscape, and we found that:1) Representational study mainly focuses on culture and power:on the one hand, the landscape can be regarded as the product of culture, and also the regeneration of culture in different periods. On the other hand, with the power game, landscape twists and turns and promote the evolution of the symbolic significance of power. 2) The landscape study of the non-representation perspective mainly focuses on the social changes of daily life, emotion, and other aspects of the social changes and their perceived diversity, complexity and instability.

导出引用

李倩菁, 蔡晓梅. 新文化地理学视角下景观研究综述与展望[J]. 人文地理. 2017, 32(1): 23-28,98 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.01.004

LI Qian-jing, CAI Xiao-mei. LITERATURE REVIEWAND ANALYSIS ON LANDSCAPE RESEARCH FROM PERSPECTIVE OF NEWCULTURAL GEOGRAPHY[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2017, 32(1): 23-28,98 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.01.004

中图分类号： G07

参考文献

[1] Naveh Z, Lieberman A S. Landscape Ecology:Theory and Application[M]. Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 1984:356.

[2] 周尚意,孔翔,朱竑.文化地理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2004:7-19.[Zhou Shangyi, Kong Xiang, Zhu Hong. Cultural Geography[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2004:7-19.]

[3] Voeks R. Sacred leaves of Brazilian Candomble[J]. Geographical Review, 1990,80(2):118-131.

[4] Anderson K, Domosh M, Pile S, et al. Handbook of Cultural Geography[M]. London:SAGE, 2002:1-282.

[5] Gregory D, Johnston R, Pratt G, et al. The Dictionary of Human Geography[M]. Sussex:Wiley-Blackwell, 2009:409-411.

[6] 王凤慧.国外现代景观地理研究的主要发展趋势[J].地理研究, 1987,6(3):81-89.[Wang Fenghui. Main trends of the development in modern landscape geographical research[J]. Geographical Research, 1987,6(3):81-89.]

[7] Wylie J. Landscapes[M]. London:Routledge, 2007:1-217.

[8] 陈静.论斯图亚特·霍尔的文化"表征"理论及其理论实践[D].桂林:广西师范大学,2006:1-42.[Chen Jing. Study on the Cultural Representation Theory of Stuart Hall and the Practice of the Theory[D]. Guilin:Guangxi Normal University, 2006:1-42.]

[9] [英]斯图尔特·霍尔,编.表征——文化表象与意指实践[M].徐亮, 陆兴华,译.北京:商务印书馆,2003.[Hall S. Representation:Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices[M]. Xu Liang, Lu Xinghua, trans. Peking:The Commercial Press, 2003.]

[10] 孙越.斯图亚特·霍尔的文化表征理论探究[D].济南:山东大学, 2012:8-40.[Sun Yue. Exploring of Stuart Hall's Cultural Representaion Theory[D]. Jinan:Shandong University, 2012:8-40.]

[11] Backhaus G, Murungi J. Symbolic Landscapes[M]. Berlin:Springer Netherlands, 2009:3-388.

[12] Howard P, Thompson I H, Waterton E. The Routledge Companion to Landscape Studies[M]. London:Routledge, 2013:66-75.

[13] Cosgrove D E. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape[M]. London:Croom Helm, 1984:3-89.

[14] Johnson M. Merleau-Ponty's embodied semantics-From immanent meaning, to gesture, to language[J]. Eurameri, 2006,36(1):1-7.

[15] Peirce C S. Logic as Semiotic:A Theory of Signs[M]. New York:Dover Publications, 1955:19-20.

[16] Crang M. Cultural Geography[M]. London:Routledge, 1998:7-139.

[17] Nast H J. Islam, gender, and slavery in West Africa circa 1500:A spatial archaeology of the Kano Palace, Northern Nigeria[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1996,86(1):44-77.

[18] Waley P. Parks and landmarks:Planning the Eastern Capital along western lines[J]. Journal of Historical Geography, 2005,31(1):1-16.

[19] Duncan J S. The superorganic in American cultural geography[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1980,70(2):181-198.

[20] Till K E. Staging the past:Landscape designs, cultural identity and Erinnerungspolitik at Berlin's Neue Wache[J]. Cultural Geographies, 1999,6(3):251-283.

[21] Purser M. The view from the Verandah:Levuka Bungalows and the transformation of settler identities in later colonialism[J]. International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 2003,7(4):293-314.

[22] Selden R, Widdowson P, Brooker P. A Reader's Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory[M]. Harlow:Pearson Longman, 2005:82-109.

[23] Lefebvre H. The Production of Space[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1991:8-67.

[24] Anderson K, Domosh M, Pile S, et al. Handbook of cultural space:A case study of "Parcul Carol I", Bucharest from 1906 to the present[J]. Europe-Asia Studies, 2010,62(9):1453-1478.

[25] Alderman, Derek H. Street names and the scaling of memory:The politics of commemorating Martin Luther King, Jr within the African American community[J]. Area, 2003,35(2):163-173.

[26] Forest B, Johnson J. Unraveling the threads of history:Soviet Era Monuments and Post Soviet national identity in Moscow[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2002,92(3):524-547.

[27] Lisa Benton-Short. Politics, public space, and memorials:The Brawl on the mall[J]. Urban Geography, 2006,27(4):297-329.

[28] Foucault M. 激进的美学锋芒[M].周宪,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:3-19.[Foucault M. Radical Spearhead of Aesthetics[M]. Zhou Xian, trans. Beijing:China Renmin University Press, 2003:3-19.]

[29] Whelan Y. The construction and destruction of a colonial landscape:Monuments to British monarchs in Dublin before and after independence[J]. Journal of Historical Geography, 2002,28(4):508-533.

[30] Leib J I. Separate times, shared spaces:Arthur Ashe, Monument avenue and the politics of Richmond, Virginia's symbolic landscape[J]. Cultural Geographies, 2002,9(3):286-312.

[31] 孙婷婷.对福柯《另类空间》的后殖民解读[J].社科纵横:新理论版, 2008(3):175-176,181.[Sun Tingting. Interpretation of Foucault's post-colonialism in Dits et écrits[J]. Social Sciences Review, 2008(3):175-176,181.]

[32] Strathern M. Shifting Contexts:Transformations in Anthropological Knowledge[M]. London:Routledge, 1995:57-80.

[33] Thrift N, Dewsbury J D. Dead geographies? And how to make them live[J]. Environment and Planning D:Society and Space, 2000,18(4):411-432.

[34] Larsen J. De-exoticizing leisure travel[J]. Leisure Studies, 2008,27(1):21-34.

[35] Owusu F, Thrift N. International encyclopedia of human geography[J]. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 2009,4(5):256-258.

[36] Lorimer H. Herding memories of humans and animals[J]. Environment & Planning D:Society and Space, 2006,24(4):497-518.

[37] Morton F. Performing ethnography:Irish traditional music sessions and new methodological spaces[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2005,6(5):661-676.

[38] Lorimer H. Cultural geography:The busyness of being ‘more-thanrepresentational’[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2005,29(1):83-94.

[39] Simpson P. ‘So, as you can see...’:Some reflections on the utility of video methodologies in the study of embodied practices[J]. Area, 2011,43(3):343-352.

[40] Wylie J. An essay on ascending Glastonbury Tor[J]. Geoforum, 2002,33(4):441-454.

[41] Cosgrove D. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape[M]. London:Croom Helm, 1984:39.

[42] Duruz J. Rewriting the village:Geographies of food and belongs in Clovelly, Australia[J]. Cultural Geographies, 2002,9(4):373-388.

[43] Kim H. Ethnicen clave economy in urban China:The Korean immigrants in Yanbian[J]. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2003,26(5):802-828.

[44] Salmenkari T. Geography of protest:Places of demonstration in Buenos Aires and Seoul[J]. Urban Geography, 2009,30(3):239-260.

[45] 王冬梅. 福柯的权利话语与后殖民主义[J].铜仁学院学报,2008(1):8-10.[Wang dongmei. Foucault's discourse and power and postcolonialism[J]. Journal of Tongren University, 2008(1):8-10.]

[46] Simpson P. Chronic everyday life:Rhythm analysing street performance[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2008,9(7):807-829.

[47] Anderson B, Wylie J. On geography and materiality[J]. Environment & Planning A, 2009,41(2):318-335.

[48] Kraftl P, Adey P. Architecture/Affect/Inhabitation:Geographies of being-in buildings[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2008,98(1):213-231.

[49] Miller J. Malls without stores (MwS):The affectual spaces of a Buenos Aires shopping mall[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2014,39(1):14-25.

[50] Baptist K. Incompatible identities:Memory and experience at the National September 9/11 Memorial and Museum[J]. Emotion, Space and Society, 2015,16:3-8.

[51] Daniels I. Feeling at home in contemporary Japan:Space, atmosphere and intimacy[J]. Emotion, Space and Society, 2015,15(1):47-55.

[52] 陈岗,黄震方.旅游景观形成与演变机制的符号学解释——兼议符号学视角下的旅游城市化与旅游商业化现象[J].人文地理, 2010,25(5):124-127.[Chen Gang, Huang Zhenfang. An explanation of mechanism of tourism landscape formation and evolution from the perspective of symbolics[J]. Human Geography, 2010,25(5):124-127.]

[53] 何深静,钱俊希,徐雨璇,等. 快速城市化背景下乡村绅士化的时空演变特征[J].地理学报,2012,67(8):1044-1056.[He Shenjing, Qian Junxi, Xu Yuxuan, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of rural gentrification amidst rapid urbanization:A case study of Xiaozhou village, Guangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012,67(8):1044-1056.]

[54] 刘博,朱竑,袁振杰. 传统节庆在地方认同建构中的意义——以广州"迎春花市"为例[J].地理研究,2012,31(12):2197-2208.[Liu Bo, Zhu Hong, Yuan Zhenjie. The significance of the traditional festival in the construction of place identity:A case study of the Winter Jasmine Flower Market in Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2012,31(12):2197-2208.]

[55] 魏雷,朱竑,唐雪琼.与女游客婚恋关系下的摩梭男性文化身份建构[J].地理研究,2011,30(11):2017-2029.[Wei Lei, Zhu Hong, Tang Xueqiong. Construction of Mosuo man's cultural identity under the romantic relationship with female tourists[J]. Geographical Research, 2011,30(11):2017-2029.]

[56] 陈霄.宁波老外滩酒吧街的不得其所与地方建构[J].地理研究, 2014,33(7):1217-1229.[Chen Xiao. Out of place and place constructing in Oldbund in Ningbo[J]. Geographical Research, 2014,33(7):1217-1229.]

[57] 唐雪琼,钱俊希,陈岚雪.旅游影响下少数民族节日的文化适应与重构——基于哈尼族长街宴演变的分析[J].地理研究,2011,30(5):835-844.[Tang Xueqiong, Qian Junxi, Chen Lanxue. Cultural adaption and reconstruction of ethnic minority festival activities in tourism development:A case study of Hani Long-Street Banquet[J]. Geographical Research, 2011,30(5):835-844.]

[58] 唐晓峰.文化地理学释义——大学讲课录[M].北京:学苑出版社, 2012:208.[Tang Xiaofeng. The Interpretation of Cultural Geography-University Recorded Lectures[M]. Beijing:Xueyuan Press, 2012:208.]

[59] 周宇.城市转型下创意产业空间的生产——以上海市为例[C]//中国城市规划学会,南京市政府.转型与重构——2011中国城市规划年会论文集.南京:2011年中国城市规划年会,2011:10.[Zhou Yu. The production of space of creative industry under the urban transformation:A case study of Shanghai[C]//Chinese Urban Planning Society, Nanjing Government. Transformation and Reconstructioin:2011 Annals Conference of Urban Planning Cellection. Nanjing:2011 Annals Conference of Urban Planning Collection, 2011:10.]

[60] 李文军. "自我"与"他者",碰撞与融合——论后殖民理论对中国民族文化建设的警示意义[J].滨州学院学报,2008,24(4):81-84.[Li Wenjun. "Self" and "others", clash and crasis-An analysis of alert role of postcolonialism to the rebuilding of Chinese national culture[J]. Journal of Binzhou University, 2008,24(4):81-84.]

[61] 谢晓如,封丹,朱竑.对文化微空间的感知与认同研究——以广州太古汇方所文化书店为例[J].地理学报,2014,69(2):184-198.[Xie Xiaoru, Feng Dan, Zhu Hong. The perception and identity to the cultural micro-space:A case study of Fangsuo Commune in Tai Koo Hui, Guangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014,69(2):184-198.]