劳动力流动、地方感与农户参与人居环境整治行为

郭晨浩; 李林霏; 夏显力

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.01.010

PDF(1989 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1) : 81-89,115. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.01.010

乡村

劳动力流动、地方感与农户参与人居环境整治行为

郭晨浩¹, 李林霏², 夏显力¹

作者信息 +

LABOR MOBILITY, SENSE OF PLACE AND FARMERS' PARTICIPATION IN HU SETTLEMENT ENVIRONMENT IMPROVEMENT BEHAVIOR

GUO Chen-hao¹, LI Lin-fei², XIA Xian-li¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

本文构建了“劳动力流动—地方感—人居环境整治行为”的理论分析框架，利用913户微观调研数据，采用有序Probit模型分析了劳动力流动对农户参与人居环境整治行为的影响，并进一步运用Bootstrap方法验证了地方感在劳动力流动影响农户参与人居环境整治过程中发挥的中介作用。研究结果表明：①家庭劳动力外流抑制了农户参与人居环境整治行为，家庭劳动力返乡促进了农户参与人居环境整治行为；解决模型可能存在的内生性问题后，影响依然显著；②地方感在劳动力流动影响农户参与人居环境整治行为过程中发挥显著中介作用：劳动力外流通过削弱农户地方感，抑制农户参与人居环境整治行为；劳动力返乡通过增强农户地方感，促进农户参与人居环境整治行为；③劳动力外流对农户参与人居环境整治的负向影响随着外出务工距离的增加而增大。

Abstract

This paper focuses on the coexistence of "labor force outflow" and "hometown return", and constructs a theoretical analysis framework of "Labor force mobility-Sense of place-Habitat improvement behavior", using the data from the 913 micro research using ordered Probit model analyzes the labor flow influence on farmers participating in the living environment improvement, and further using the Bootstrap method to verify the sense of place in labor mobility affects farmers participate in play a mediating role in the process of human settlement environment improvement. The results show that:First, the outflow of family labor inhibits the behavior of farmers participating in the improvement of human settlements, and the return of family labor promotes the behavior of farmers participating in the improvement of human settlements; after solving the endogenous problems that may exist in the model, the impact is still significant. Second, sense of place plays a significant mediating role in the process of labor mobility affecting farmers' participation in human settlements improvement:The outflow of labor force can weaken the sense of place of farmers and inhibit their participation in the improvement of human settlements; the return of labor force can enhance the sense of place of farmers and promote their participation in the improvement of human settlements. Third, considering the spatial factor, the negative effect of labor force outflow on farmers' participation in habitat improvement increases with the increase of distance to work. Based on the above findings, the government should strengthen publicity and education, improve the supervision system, encourage laborers to return to their hometowns, and enhance farmers' sense of place.

导出引用

郭晨浩, 李林霏, 夏显力. 劳动力流动、地方感与农户参与人居环境整治行为[J]. 人文地理. 2022, 37(1): 81-89,115 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.01.010

GUO Chen-hao, LI Lin-fei, XIA Xian-li. LABOR MOBILITY, SENSE OF PLACE AND FARMERS' PARTICIPATION IN HU SETTLEMENT ENVIRONMENT IMPROVEMENT BEHAVIOR[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2022, 37(1): 81-89,115 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.01.010

中图分类号： C912.8 F329.9

参考文献

[1] 闵师, 王晓兵, 侯玲玲, 等.农户参与人居环境整治的影响因素——基于西南山区的调查数据[J].中国农村观察, 2019(4):94-110.[Min Shi, Wang Xiaobing, Hou Lingling, et al. Influencing factors of farmers' participation in human settlement environment improvement:Based on the survey data of southwest mountainous area[J]. China Rural Survey, 2019(4):94-110.]
[2] 蒋培.农村环境内发性治理的社会机制研究[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 19(4):49-57.[Jiang Pei. Study on social mechanism of endogenous governance of rural environment[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 19(4):49-57.]
[3] 王晓东, 李繁荣.农村劳动力流动正向驱动乡村绿色发展研究——基于新中国成立70年历史的分析[J]. 经济问题, 2019(12):104-113.[Wang Xiaodong, Li Fanrong. Research on the positive driving force of rural green development by rural labor mobility:Based on the analysis of the 70 year history of new China[J]. On Economic Problems, 2019(12):104-113.]
[4] 张文武.农业人口转移、投入要素替代与乡村产业振兴[J].审计与经济研究, 2019, 34(5):96-106.[Zhang Wenwu. Transfer of agricultural population, substitution of input factors and revitalization of rural industry[J]. Audit & Economy Research, 2019, 34(5):96-106.]
[5] 唐林, 罗小锋, 黄炎忠, 等.劳动力流动抑制了农户参与村域环境治理吗?——基于湖北省的调查数据[J].中国农村经济, 2019(9):88-103.[Tang Lin, Luo Xiaofeng, Huang Yanzhong, et al. Does labor mobility inhibit farmers' participation in village environmental governance? Based on the survey data of Hubei province[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(9):88-103.]
[6] 王博, 朱玉春.劳动力外流与农户参与村庄集体行动选择——以农户参与小型农田水利设施供给为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(12):49-54.[Wang Bo, Zhu Yuchun. Labor outflow and farmers' participation in village collective action choice:A case study of farmers' participation in the supply of small irrigation and water conservancy facilities[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(12):49-54.]
[7] 王学婷, 张俊飚, 童庆蒙.地方依恋有助于提高农户村庄环境治理参与意愿吗?——基于湖北省调查数据的分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(4):136-148.[Wang Xueting, Zhang Junbiao, Tong Qingmeng. Does place attachment help to enhance farmers' willingness to participate in rural environmental governance? Based on the survey data of Hubei province[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(4):136-148.]
[8] 苏毅清, 秦明, 王亚华.劳动力外流背景下土地流转对农村集体行动能力的影响——基于社会生态系统(SES)框架的研究[J].管理世界, 2020(7):185-198.[Su Yiqing, Qin Ming, Wang Yahua. The impact of farmland transfer on rural collective action under the scenario of labor outmigration:A research based on social-ecological system(SES) framework[J]. Management World, 2020(7):185-198.]
[9] 黄季焜, 刘莹.农村环境污染情况及影响因素分析——来自全国百村的实证分析[J].管理学报, 2010, 7(11):1725-1729.[Huang Jikun, Liu Ying. Environmental pollution in rural China and its driving forces[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2010, 7(11):1725-1729.]
[10] 沈费伟, 刘祖云.农村环境善治的逻辑重塑——基于利益相关者理论的分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(5):32-38.[Shen Feiwei, Liu Zuyun. The logical reconstruction of good governance of rural environment:Based on the analysis of stakeholder theory[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(5):32-38.]
[11] 何可, 张俊飚, 张露, 等.人际信任、制度信任与农民环境治理参与意愿——以农业废弃物资源化为例[J]. 管理世界, 2015(5):75-88.[He Ke, Zhang Junbiao, Zhang Lu, et al. Interpersonal trust, institutional trust and farmers' willingness to participate in environmental governance:Take agricultural waste recycling as an example[J]. Management World, 2015(5):75-88.]
[12] 夏佳奇, 何可, 张俊飚.环境规制与村规民约对农户绿色生产意愿的影响——以规模养猪户养殖废弃物资源化利用为例[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2019, 27(12):1925-1936.[Xia Jiaqi, He Ke, Zhang Junbiao. Impact of environmental regulations and village regulations on Farmers' willingness to green production:Take largescale pig breeding waste resource utilization as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(12):1925-1936.]
[13] 汪红梅, 惠涛, 张倩.信任和收入对农户参与村域环境治理的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 18(5):94-103.[Wang Hongmei, Hui Tao, Zhang Qian. Effect of trust and income on farmers' participation in rural environmental governance[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition), 2018, 18(5):94-103.]
[14] 唐林, 罗小锋, 张俊飚.社会监督、群体认同与农户生活垃圾集中处理行为——基于面子观念的中介和调节作用[J].中国农村观察, 2019(2):18-33.[Tang Lin, Luo Xiaofeng, Zhang Junbiao. Social supervision, group identity and farmers' centralized treatment of domestic waste:The mediating and regulating role based on the concept of face[J]. China Rural Survey, 2019(2):18-33.]
[15] 任远, 施闻.农村外出劳动力回流迁移的影响因素和回流效应[J]. 人口研究, 2017, 41(2):71-83.[Ren Yuan, Shi Wen. Influencing factors and effects of rural migrant labor migration[J]. Population Research, 2017, 41(2):71-83.]
[16] Zhao Y. Causes and consequences of return migration:Recent evidence from China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2002, 30(2):376-394.
[17] Kapur D. Remittances:The new development mantra?[Z/OL]. (2004-04-29)[2021-05-04]. No 29, G-24. Discussion Papers from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/gdsmdpbg2420045_en.pdf.
[18] 黄旭.地方感的研究路径探索:心象运动论的方法[J].人文地理, 2021, 36(4):1-8.[Huang Xu. Exploring a research approach for sense of place:A method of mind-image-motion[J]. Human Geography, 2021, 36(4):1-8.]
[19] 郑昌辉.在城镇化背景下重新认识地方感——概念与研究进展综述[J].城市发展研究, 2020, 27(5):116-124.[Zheng Changhui. Re understanding the sense of place under the background of urbanization:Review of concept and research progress[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020, 27(5):116-124.]
[20] Tuan Y F. Topophilia:A study of environmental perception attitudes, and values[J]. Leonardo, 1975, 9(2):313.
[21] Shamai S. Sense of place:An empirical measurement[J]. Geoforum, 1991, 22(3):347-358.
[22] Jorgensen B S, Stedman R C. Sense of place as an attitude:Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2001, 21:233-248.
[23] 万基财, 张捷, 卢韶婧, 等.九寨沟地方特质与旅游者地方依恋和环保行为倾向的关系[J].地理科学进展, 2014, 33(3):411-421.[Wan Jicai, Zhang Jie, Lu Shaojing, et al. The relationship between Jiuzhaigou local characteristics and tourists' local attachment and environmental behavior tendency[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(3):411-421.]
[24] Mahyar A. Non-place and placelessness as narratives of loss:Rethinking the notion of place[J]. Journal of Urban Design, 1999, 4(2):179-193.
[25] 邹杰玲, 董政祎, 王玉斌". 同途殊归":劳动力外出务工对农户采用可持续农业技术的影响[J].中国农村经济, 2018(8):83-98.[Zou Jieling, Dong Zhengyi, Wang Yubin. "The same way but different return":The impact of labor force's migrant work on farmers' adoption of sustainable agricultural technology[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(8):83-98.]
[26] 周广肃, 谭华清, 李力行.外出务工经历有益于返乡农民工创业吗?[J].经济学(季刊), 2017, 16(2):793-814.[Zhou Guangsu, Tan Huaqing, Li Lixing. Is the experience of migrant workers beneficial to the entrepreneurship of returning migrant workers[J]. China Economic Quarterly, 2017, 16(2):793-814.]
[27] 庄春萍, 张建新.地方认同:环境心理学视角下的分析[J].心理科学进展, 2011, 19(9):1387-1396.[Zhuang Chunping, Zhang Jianxin. Local identity:An analysis from the perspective of environmental psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2011, 19(9):1387-1396.]
[28] Preacher K J, Rucker D D, Hayes A F. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses:Theory, methods, and prescriptions[J]. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007, 42(1):185-227.
[29] 谢勇, 杨倩.外出务工经历、创业行为与创业绩效[J].经济评论, 2020(1):146-160.[Xie Yong, Yang Qian. Migrant work experience, entrepreneurial behavior and entrepreneurial performance[J]. Economic Review, 2020(1):146-160.]
[30] 陈媛媛, 傅伟.土地承包经营权流转、劳动力流动与农业生产[J].管理世界, 2017(11):79-93.[Chen Yuanyuan, Fu Wei. Circulation of land contract management right, labor force flow and agricultural production[J]. Management World, 2017(11):79-93.]