RURAL INHABITANTS' CONSIDERATION OF QUITTING RURAL HOUSING LAND AND SETTLEMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN FRINGE: A CASE STUDY IN JIANGNING DISTRICT, NANJING

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.02.011

PDF(1591 KB)

HUMAN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2) : 72-79. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.02.011

RURAL INHABITANTS' CONSIDERATION OF QUITTING RURAL HOUSING LAND AND SETTLEMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN FRINGE: A CASE STUDY IN JIANGNING DISTRICT, NANJING

TANG Shuang-shuang¹, HAO Pu², HUANG Xian-jin¹

Author information +

History +

Abstract

The rapid urbanization in China has improved the transformation of rural development and the spatial restructure of rural areas. The changes of both macro and micro contexts, such as the raising of "increasing vs. decreasing balance" land-use policy, the increase of rural land compensation, rural inhabitants'education level, and the rate of non-agricultural employments, as well as the large emergence of the new generation of rural inhabitants, have largely influenced rural inhabitants' considerations of both quitting rural housing plot and future settlement. Previous studies have focused on the rural inhabitants' intention or behaviour of quitting rural housing land or the features and conditions of rural migrants in urban areas, limited research has associated both rural land and settlement. In order to bridge the gap, based on a survey in a suburb district in Nanjing in 2014, the paper tries to explore rural inhabitants' intention of both quitting rural housing plot and their future settlement in the metropolitan fringe in the developed region. The paper finds: 1） The conditions of village, the human capital of rural residents and the advantages of resettled sites significantly influence rural inhabitants' intention of both quitting rural housing land and future settlement. 2） In the metropolitan fringe of Nanjing, nearly half of rural inhabitants did not intent to give up their rural housing land for compensations, and most of them have a negative attitude towards current compensation policy. 3） After quitting rural housing land, a number of rural inhabitants in the metropolitan fringe of Nanjing tend to live in local towns other than large cities, partly due to the sufficient employment opportunities, good urban amenities and social resources.

Key words

quitting rural housing land / rural inhabitants / settlement / regression model / Nanjing

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

TANG Shuang-shuang, HAO Pu, HUANG Xian-jin. RURAL INHABITANTS' CONSIDERATION OF QUITTING RURAL HOUSING LAND AND SETTLEMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN FRINGE: A CASE STUDY IN JIANGNING DISTRICT, NANJING[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2017, 32(2): 72-79 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.02.011

References

[1] 陈晓华,张小林,马远军.快速城市化背景下我国乡村的空间转型[J].南京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,31(1):125-129. [Chen Xiaohua, Zhang Xiaolin, Ma Yuanjun. China's rural spatial transition in the period of rapid urbanization [J]. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2008,31(1):125-129.]

[2] 李秀彬.对加速城镇化时期土地利用变化核心学术问题的认识[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2009,19(5):1-5. [Li Xiubin. Research priorities for land use change in the accelerated phase of urbanization[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2009,19(5):1-5.]

[3] 龙花楼.论土地利用转型与乡村转型发展[J].地理科学进展,2012, 31(2):131-138. [Long Hualou. Land use transition and rural transformation development[J]. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(2):131-138.]

[4] 罗小龙,许骁“. 十三五”时期乡村转型发展与规划应对[J].城市规划,2015,39(3):15-23. [Luo Xiaolong, Xu Xiao. Rural transformation and planning responses in the 13th five-year plan period[J]. City Planning Review, 2015,39(3):15-23.]

[5] 龙花楼.论土地整治与乡村空间重构[J]. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8): 1019-1028. [Long Hualou. Land consolidation and rural spatial restructuring[ J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013,68(8):1019-1028.]

[6] 陆大道.我国的城镇化进程与空间扩张[J].城市规划学刊,2007(4): 47-52. [Lu Dadao. Urbanization process and spatial sprawl in China[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2007(4):47-52.]

[7] 王春光.新生代农村流动人口的社会认同与城乡融合的关系[J].社会学研究,2001(3):63-76. [Wang Chunguang. The relation between social identity and urban-rural integration of the second generation of rural migrants[J]. Sociological Research, 2001(3):63-76.]

[8] 悦中山,李树茁,费尔德曼,等.徘徊在三岔路口:两代农民工发展意愿的比较研究[J].人口与经济,2009(6):58-66. [Yue Zhongshan, Li Shuzhuo, Marcus W F, et al. Wandering at crossroad: A comparative study on development will of two generation of migrant rural workers[ J]. Population & Economics, 2009(6):58-66.]

[9] 段成荣,马学阳.当前我国新生代农民工的新状况[J].人口与经济, 2011(4):16-22. [Duan Chengrong, Ma Xueyang. A study on the new situation of the younger generation of farmer-turned migrant workers in China [J]. Population & Economics, 2011(4):16-22.]

[10] 刘彦随.中国东部沿海地区乡村转型发展与新农村建设[J].地理学报,2007,62(6):563-570. [Liu Yansui. Rural transformation development and new countryside construction in eastern coastal area of China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007,62(6):563-570.]

[11] 黄贤金.城市化进程中土地流转对城乡发展的影响[J].现代城市研究,2010(4):15-18. [Huang Xianjin. The effects of land transfer to urban-rural development in the process of urbanization[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2010(4):15-18.]

[12] 刘卫柏,李中.新时期农村土地流转模式的运行绩效与对策[J].经济地理,2011,31(2):300-304. [Liu Weibo, Li Zhong. Operating performance for the modes of rural land transfer and strategies in new times[J]. Economic Geography, 2011,31(2):300-304.]

[13] 欧阳安蛟,蔡峰铭,陈立定.农村宅基地退出机制建立探讨[J].中国土地科学,2009,23(10):26-30. [Ouyang Anjiao, Cai Fengming, Chen Liding. Discussion on establishment of exit mechanism for rural residential land[J]. China Land Science, 2009,23(10):26-30.]

[14] 程春丽.农村宅基地退出补偿与利益机制构建探析[J].农村经济, 2014(1):13-17. [Chen Chunli. Establishment of compensation and exit mechanism of rural housing plot[J]. Rural Economy, 2014(1): 13-17.]

[15] 王兆林,杨庆媛,张佰林,等.户籍制度改革中农户土地退出意愿及其影响因素分析[J].中国农村经济,2011(11):49-61. [Wang Zhaolin, Yang Qinyuan, Zhao Bailin, et al. Exit intention of rural housing plot in hukou reforms and its influential factors[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2011(11):49-61.]

[16] 黄贻芳,钟涨宝.不同类型农户对宅基地退出的响应:以重庆梁平县为例[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2013,22(7):852-857. [Huang Yifang, Zhong Zhangbo. Reaction of different types of rural households on the rural residential land quittance policy: Based on the survey from Liangping county[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2013,22(7):852-857.]

[17] 许恒周.基于农户受偿意愿的宅基地退出补偿及影响因素分析: 以山东省临清市为例[J].中国土地科学,2012,26(10):75-81. [Xu Hengzhou. Compensation for quitting rural residential land and its influential factors based on farmers' willingness to accept: A case study of Linqing city in Shandong province[J]. China Land Sciences, 2012,26(10):75-81.]

[18] 彭长生.农民分化对农村宅基地退出补偿模式选择的影响分析[J].经济社会体制比较,2013(6):133-146. [Peng Changsheng. Analysis of the influence of peasants' social stratum on their choice of monetary compensation model for leaving their rural homestead: Base on survey data of farmers in Anhui province[J]. Comparative Economic & Social Systems,2013(6):133-146.]

[19] 刘同山,牛立腾.农户分化、土地退出意愿与农民的选择偏好[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(6):114-120. [Liu Tongshan, Niu Liteng. Rural-household differentiation, willingness of land usufruct abdication and farmers' choice preference[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014,24(6):114-120.]

[20] 许恒周,殷红春,石淑芹.代际差异视角下农民工乡城迁移与宅基地退出影响因素分析:基于推拉理论的实证研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(8):75-80. [Xu Hengzhou, Yin Hongchun, Shi Shuqin. Analysis of influential factors of withdrawing from rural residential land and migrant workers' urban-rural migration under the perspective of intergenerational differences: An empirical study on the basis of push-pull theory[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013,23(8):75-80.]

[21] 许恒周,吴冠岑,郭玉燕,等.宅基地确权对不同代际农民工宅基地退出意愿影响分析:基于天津248 份调查问卷的实证研究[J].资源科学,2013,35(7):1423-1429. [Xu Hengzhou, Wu Guanceng, Guo Yuyan, et al. The influence of homestead right for different generations of rural workers: Based on the survey in Tianjin[J]. Resources Science, 2013,35(7):1423-1429.]

[22] 张怡然,邱道持,李艳,等.农民工进城落户与宅基地退出影响因素分析:基于重庆市开县357 份农民工的调查问卷[J].中国软科学, 2011(2):62-68. [Zhang Yiran, Qiu Daochi, Li Yan, et al. Analysis of influencing factors for migrant workers settling into the city and exit mechanism for rural residential land based on 357 surveys of migrant workers from Kai county[J]. China Soft Science, 2011(2):62-68.]

[23] 朱宇,余立,林李月,等.两代流动人口在城镇定居意愿的代际延续和变化:基于福建省的调查[J].人文地理,2012,27(3):1-6. [Zhu Yu, Yu Li, Lin Liyue, et al. The continuity and change in the urban settlement intention between the two generation migrants[J]. Human Geography, 2012,27(3):1-6.]

[24] 王玉君.农民工城市定居意愿研究:基于十二个城市问卷调查的实证分析[J].人口研究,2013,37(4):19-32. [Wang Yujun. Settlement intention of rural migrants in Chinese cities: Findings from a twelve-city migrant survey[J]. Population Research, 2013,37(4):19-32.]

[25] Cai H, Wang J. Factors, influencing the migration intentions of rural workers in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2008,24(3):157-171.

[26] Zhu Y. China's floating population and their settlement intention in the cities: Beyond the Hukou reform [J]. Habitat International, 2007,31(1):65-76.

[27] 汤爽爽,黄贤金.农村流动人口定居意愿与农村土地关系:以江苏省不同发展程度地区为例[J].城市规划,2015(3):42-48. [Tang Shuangshuang, Huang Xianjin. Relationship between rural migrants' settlement intention in cities and rural land: A case study on areas at different economic levels in Jiangsu province [J]. City Planning Review, 2015(3):42-48.]

[28] Hao P, Tang S. Floating or settling down: The effect of rural landholdings on the settlement intention of rural migrants in urban China[ J]. Environment and Planning A, 2015,47:1979-1999.

[29] Todaro M. International migration in developing countries [J]. Interenational Migration Review, 1976,11(2):721-798.

[30] Stark O. The Migration of Labor[M]. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1991:23-32.

[31] 许恒周,郭忠兴.农村土地流动影响因素的理论与实证研究:基于农民阶层分化与产权偏好的视角[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011 (3):94-98. [Xu Hengzhou, Guo Zhongxing. Theoretic and empirical research on influential factors of rural land transfer based on the perspective of hierarchy differentiation and property rights preference[ J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011(3):94-98.]

[32] 张京祥,申明锐,赵晨.乡村复兴:生产主义和后生产主义下的中国乡村转型[J]. 国际城市规划,2014,29(5):1-7. [Zhang Jingxiang, Shen Mingrui, Zhao Chen. Rural renaissance: Rural China transformation under productivism and post-productivism[J]. Urban Planning International, 2014,29(5):1-7.]