RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PERCEIVED ACCESSIBILITY IN THE WEST AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR DOMESTIC RESEARCH

Wen-liang HUANG, Yang HU, Guo-fang ZHAI

HUMAN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6) : 19-29.

PDF(2814 KB)
PDF(2814 KB)
HUMAN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6) : 19-29. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.06.003
Theory Development

RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PERCEIVED ACCESSIBILITY IN THE WEST AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR DOMESTIC RESEARCH

Author information +
History +

Abstract

With the continuous refinement of humanistic planning and the growing complexity of human-land relationships, the fairness issues caused by traditional communities ignoring the diverse needs of residents have gradually emerged. Simultaneously, there has been a rising interest in the individual's needs and perceptions in the field of social sciences. Given that individual perceptions and needs significantly influence travel behavior and activity participation, relying solely on spatial data for objective accessibility often fails to provide complete information. Western scholars have begun to shift their research focus to perceived accessibility. Currently, perceived accessibility, owing to its unique advantages, has emerged as a significant complement in accessibility research. However, compared with the rich research achievements in the West, studies in China are still relatively lacking. Therefore, based on a comprehensive understanding of the current Western research status, the paper systematically reviews the origins, core concepts, and measurement methods of perceived accessibility. Subsequently, by examining the research content of perceived accessibility across four key dimensions: travel modes, population groups, spatial locations and emerging technologies, the paper proposes future directions and a framework for in-depth research on perceived accessibility. Finally, considering the current research gaps in China, the paper summarizes the implications of Western perceived accessibility research for accessibility studies in China, aiming to provide a basis and support for theoretical exploration and practical research in relevant fields.

Key words

humanism / perceived accessibility / objective accessibility / conceptual model / assessment method

Cite this article

Download Citations
Wen-liang HUANG , Yang HU , Guo-fang ZHAI. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PERCEIVED ACCESSIBILITY IN THE WEST AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR DOMESTIC RESEARCH[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2025, 40(6): 19-29 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.06.003

References

1
赵鹏军, 罗佳, 胡昊宇. 基于大数据的生活圈范围与服务设施空间匹配研究——以北京为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40 (4): 541- 553.
Zhao Pengjun , Luo Jia , Hu Haoyu . Spatial match between residents' daily life circle and public service facilities using big data analytics: A case of Beijing[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40 (4): 541- 553.
2
周春山, 高军波. 转型期中国城市公共服务设施供给模式及其形成机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31 (3): 272- 279.
Zhou Chunshan , Gao Junbo . Provision pattern of urban public service facilities and its formation mechanism during transitional China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31 (3): 272- 279.
3
钟家晖, 易芳蓉, 何正国, 等. 基于弱势人群个体可达性评价的社区服务设施配置研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24 (5): 875- 888.
Zhong Jiahun , Yi Fangrong , He Zhengguo , et al. Research on allocation of community service facilities based on evaluation of individual accessibilityof vulnerable people[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2022, 24 (5): 875- 888.
4
陆锋, 陈洁. 武汉城市圈城市区位与可达性分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2008 (4): 68- 74.
Lu Feng , Chen Jie . Location superiority and accessibility analysis on wuhan metropolitan region[J]. Progress in Geography, 2008 (4): 68- 74.
5
宋正娜, 陈雯, 张桂香, 等. 公共服务设施空间可达性及其度量方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29 (10): 1217- 1224.
Song Zhengna , Chen Wen , Zhang Guixiang , et al. Spatial accessibility to public service facilities and its measurement approaches[J]. Progress in Geography, 2010, 29 (10): 1217- 1224.
6
Van Wee B . Accessible accessibility research challenges[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2016, 51, 9- 16.
7
张婧远, 陈培育. 面向城市公园的感知可达性研究进展述评与人本规划思潮下的应用启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2021, 36 (5): 96- 103.
Zhang Jingyuan , Chen Peiyu . Reviewing the research development of perceived accessibility to urban parks and its application inspirations in the trend of human-oriented planning[J]. Urban Planning International, 2021, 36 (5): 96- 103.
8
Lättman K , Olsson L E , Friman M . A new approach to accessibility-Examining perceived accessibility in contrast to objectively measured accessibility in daily travel[J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2018, 69, 501- 511.
9
Curl A , Nelson J D , Anable J . Same question, different answer: A comparison of GIS-based journey time accessibility with selfreported measures from the National Travel Survey in England[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2015, 49, 86- 97.
10
Ma L , Cao J . How perceptions mediate the effects of the built environment on travel behavior?[J]. Transportation, 2019, 46, 175- 197.
11
刘春济, 高静. 大都市滨水区感知可达性的维度结构及其关系——以上海市浦江滨水区为例[J]. 城市问题, 2017 (12): 33- 39.
Liu Chunji , Gao Jing . Dimension structure and relationship of perceived accessibility in metropolitan waterfronts: A case study of the Shanghai Pujiang waterpronts[J]. Urban Problems, 2017 (12): 33- 39.
12
Lättman K , Olsson L E , Friman M . Development and test of the perceived accessibility scale (PAC) in public transport[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2016, 54, 257- 263.
13
Pot F J , van Wee B , Tillema T . Perceived accessibility: What it is and why it differs from calculated accessibility measures based on spatial data[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2021, 94, 103090.
14
尹海伟, 徐建刚. 上海公园空间可达性与公平性分析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2009, 16 (6): 71- 76.
Yin Haiwei , Xu Jiangang . Spatial accessibility and equity of parks in Shanghai[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2009, 16 (6): 71- 76.
15
陈洁, 陆锋, 程昌秀. 可达性度量方法及应用研究进展评述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2007 (5): 100- 110.
Chen Jie , Lu Feng , Cheng Changxiu . Advance in accessibility evaluation approaches and applications[J]. Progress in Geography, 2007 (5): 100- 110.
16
Hansen W G . How accessibility shapes land use[J]. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1959, 25 (2): 73- 76.
17
Wang D , Brown G , Liu Y , et al. A comparison of perceived and geographic access to predict urban park use[J]. Cities, 2015, 42, 85- 96.
18
Geurs K T , Van Wee B . Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2004, 12 (2): 127- 140.
19
Bisht S S , Mishra V , Fuloria S . Measuring accessibility for inclusive development: A census based index[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2010, 98, 167- 181.
20
Ferreira A , Batey P . Re-thinking accessibility planning: A multilayer conceptual framework and its policy implications[J]. The Town Planning Review, 2007, 429- 458.
21
Budd J W , Mumford K A . Family-friendly work practices in Britain: Availability and perceived accessibility[J]. Human Resource Management, 2006, 45 (1): 23- 42.
22
Mehrabian A , Russell J A . An approach to environmental psychology[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1974: 77- 134.
23
Kirk W , Lösch A , Berlin I . Problems of geography[J]. Geography, 1963, 48 (4): 357- 371.
24
Ma L , Dill J , Mohr C . The objective versus the perceived environment: what matters for bicycling?[J]. Transportation, 2014, 41, 1135- 1152.
25
Thorndyke P W , Hayes-Roth B . Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1982, 14 (4): 560- 589.
26
Hegarty M , Montello D R , Richardson A E , et al. Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning[J]. Intelligence, 2006, 34 (2): 151- 176.
27
Morris J M , Dumble P L , Wigan M R . Accessibility indicators for transport planning[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 1979, 13 (2): 91- 109.
28
Cheng Y H , Chen S Y . Perceived accessibility, mobility, and connectivity of public transportation systems[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 77, 386- 403.
29
Curl A . The importance of understanding perceptions of accessibility when addressing transport equity[J]. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2018, 11 (1): 1147- 1162.
30
Geurs K T , van Eck J R R . Accessibility Measures: Review and Applications: Evaluation of Accessibility Impacts of Land-Use Transport Scenarios, and Related Social and Economic Impacts[M]. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu[M]. 2001: 171- 241.
31
Liu Q , An Z , Liu Y , et al. Smartphone-based services, perceived accessibility, and transport inequity during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-lagged panel study[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2021, 97, 102941.
32
Levinson D , Wu H . Towards a general theory of access[J]. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2020, 13 (1): 129- 158.
33
Lättman K , Friman M , Olsson L E . Perceived accessibility of public transport as a potential indicator of social inclusion[J]. Social inclusion, 2016, 4 (3): 36- 45.
34
Ryan M , Lin T , Xia J C , et al. Comparison of perceived and measured accessibility between different age groups and travel modes at Greenwood Station, Perth, Australia[J]. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 2016, 16 (2): 406- 423.
35
Coppola P , Silvestri F . Estimating and visualizing perceived accessibility to transportation and urban facilities[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2018, 31, 136- 145.
36
Friman M , Lättman K , Olsson L E . Carpoolers' perceived accessibility of carpooling[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12 (21): 8976.
37
Vlugt A L V D , Curl A , Wittowsky D . What about the people? Developing measures of perceived accessibility from case studies in Germany and the UK[J]. Applied Mobilities, 2019, 4 (2): 142- 162.
38
Liu Q , Liu Z , Lin S , et al. Perceived accessibility and mental health consequences of COVID-19 containment policies[J]. Journal of Transport & Health, 2022, 25, 101354.
39
De Vos J , Singleton P A . Travel and cognitive dissonance[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 138, 525- 536.
40
Lotfi S , Koohsari M J . Analyzing accessibility dimension of urban quality of life: Where urban designers face duality between subjective and objective reading of place[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2009, 94, 417- 435.
41
Sundling C , Berglund B , Nilsson M E , et al. New perspective on the accessibility of railway transport for the vulnerable traveller[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2013, 459, 012021.
42
Curl A , Nelson J D , Anable J . Does accessibility planning address what matters? A review of current practice and practitioner perspectives[J]. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2011, 2, 3- 11.
43
El Murr K , Boisjoly G , Waygood E O D . Measuring accessibility to parks: Analyzing the relationship between self-reported and calculated measures[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2023, 107, 103550.
44
Vitman-Schorr A , Ayalon L , Khalaila R . Perceived accessibility to services and sites among Israeli older adults[J]. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 2019, 38 (1): 112- 136.
45
Segev-Jacubovski O , Shapiro E . Role of participation in activities and perceived accessibility on quality of life among nondisabled older adults and those with disabilities in israel during COVID-19[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, 19 (10): 5878.
46
He J , Wang X , Gao X . Spatial cognition mechanism of health: The relationship between perceived accessibility of medical facilities and health and health behaviour[J]. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 2023, 64 (1): 17- 31.
47
Gan Z , Yang M , Zeng Q , et al. Associations between built environment, perceived walkability/bikeability and metro transfer patterns[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2021, 153, 171- 187.
48
Andersson J , Björklund G , Warner H W , et al. The complexity of changes in modal choice: A quasi-experimental study[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2023, 96, 36- 47.
49
Lättman K , Friman M , Olsson L E . Restricted car-use and perceived accessibility[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport And Environment, 2020, 78, 102213.
50
Smart M J , Klein N J . Remembrance of cars and buses past: How prior life experiences influence travel[J]. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2018, 38 (2): 139- 151.
51
Scheepers C E , Wendel-Vos G C W , Van Kempen E , et al. Perceived accessibility is an important factor in transport choice: Results from the AVENUE project[J]. Journal of Transport & Health, 2016, 3 (1): 96- 106.
52
Guo Y , He S Y . The role of objective and perceived built environments in affecting dockless bike-sharing as a feeder mode choice of metro commuting[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2021, 149, 377- 396.
53
He S Y , Sun K K , Luo S . Factors affecting electric vehicle adoption intention[J]. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 2022, 15 (1): 779- 801.
54
Friman M , Lättman K , Olsson L E . Public transport quality, safety, and perceived accessibility[J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12 (9): 3563.
55
Tanimoto R , Hanibuchi T . Associations between the sense of accessibility, accessibility to specific destinations, and personal factors: A cross-sectional study in Sendai, Japan[J]. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2021, 12, 100491.
56
Lättman K , Olsson L E , Friman M , et al. Perceived accessibility, satisfaction with daily travel, and life satisfaction among the elderly[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16 (22): 4498.
57
Vlugt A L V D , Curl A , Scheiner J . The influence of travel attitudes on perceived walking accessibility and walking behaviour[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2022, 27, 47- 56.
58
Márquez L , Poveda J C , Vega L A . Factors affecting personal autonomy and perceived accessibility of people with mobility impairments in an urban transportation choice context[J]. Journal of Transport & Health, 2019, 14, 100583.
59
Sundling C , Berglund B , Nilsson M E , et al. Overall accessibility to traveling by rail for the elderly with and without functional limitations: The whole-trip perspective[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2014, 11 (12): 12938- 12968.
60
Rijnks R H , Koster S , McCann P . Spatial heterogeneity in amenity and labor market migration[J]. International Regional Science Review, 2018, 41 (2): 183- 209.
61
Coevering P V D , Maat K , Kroesen M , et al. Causal effects of built environment characteristics on travel behaviour: A longitudinal approach[J]. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 2016, 16 (4): 674- 697.
62
Guan X , Wang D , Jason Cao X . The role of residential selfselection in land use-travel research: A review of recent findings[J]. Transport Reviews, 2020, 40 (3): 267- 287.
63
Pot F J , Koster S , Tillema T . Perceived accessibility and residential selfselection in the Netherlands[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2023, 108, 103555.
64
Pot F J , Koster S , Tillema T . Perceived accessibility in Dutch rural areas: Bridging the gap with accessibility based on spatial data[J]. Transport Policy, 2023, 138, 170- 184.
65
赵渺希, 陈汝霜. 网络社会视角下的城市意象理论辨析与规划应用[J]. 人文地理, 2023, 38 (1): 71- 78.
Zhao Miaoxi , Chen Rushuang . Theoretical progress and planning prospect of city image in the network society[J]. Human Geography, 2023, 38 (1): 71- 78.
66
Wang D , Park S , Fesenmaier D R . The role of smartphones in mediating the touristic experience[J]. Journal of Travel Research, 2012, 51 (4): 371- 387.
67
Ishikawa T . Spatial thinking, cognitive mapping, and spatial awareness[J]. Cognitive Processing, 2021, 22 (Suppl 1): 89- 96.
68
Maguire E A , Gadian D G , Johnsrude I S , et al. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000, 97 (8): 4398- 4403.
69
Willis K S , Hölscher C , Wilbertz G , et al. A comparison of spatial knowledge acquisition with maps and mobile maps[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2009, 33 (2): 100- 110.
70
Ishikawa T , Fujiwara H , Imai O , et al. Wayfinding with a GPSbased mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct experience[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2008, 28 (1): 74- 82.
71
Jamei E , Chan M , Chau H W , et al. Perceived accessibility and key influencing factors in transportation[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14 (17): 10806.
72
Olsson L E , Friman M , Lättman K . Accessibility barriers and perceived accessibility: Implications for public transport[J]. Urban Science, 2021, 5 (3): 63.
73
Kar A , Le H T K , Miller H J . Inclusive accessibility: Integrating heterogeneous user mobility perceptions into space-time prisms[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2023, 113 (10): 2456- 2479.
74
De Vos J , Lättman K , Vlugt A L V D , et al. Determinants and effects of perceived walkability: A literature review, conceptual model and research agenda[J]. Transport Reviews, 2023, 43 (2): 303- 324.
75
Ma L , Ye R . Utilitarian bicycling and mental wellbeing: Role of the built environment[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2022, 88 (2): 262- 276.
76
Sealy-Jefferson S , Giurgescu C , Slaughter-Acey J , et al. Neighborhood context and preterm delivery among African American women: The mediating role of psychosocial factors[J]. Journal of Urban Health, 2016, 93, 984- 996.
77
Suarez-Balcazar Y , Early A R , Garcia C , et al. Walkability safety and walkability participation: A health concern[J]. Health Education & Behavior, 2020, 47 (3): 430- 438.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

All rights reserved, without authorization
PDF(2814 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/