PDF(15989 KB)
TOURIST ENGAGEMENT AND VILLAGE RESUBJECTIFICATION DRIVEN BY TOURISM BASED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: A CASE STUDY OF THE KAYABUKI-NO-SATO SUPPORTER PROGRAM IN JAPAN
Qi LI
HUMAN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3) : 164-173.
PDF(15989 KB)
PDF(15989 KB)
TOURIST ENGAGEMENT AND VILLAGE RESUBJECTIFICATION DRIVEN BY TOURISM BASED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: A CASE STUDY OF THE KAYABUKI-NO-SATO SUPPORTER PROGRAM IN JAPAN
Against the backdrop of ongoing rural population decline and the weakening of community subjectivity, tourism-based villages face a pressing challenge: how to reconstruct sustainable local support systems.Traditional approaches to community development often rely on the long-term participation of permanent residents; however, in depopulated and aging regions, such models are increasingly unsustainable. In response, this study takes the Yuki-tōrō Supporter Program in Kayabuki-no-Sato, Miyama Town, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan, as a case study. Grounded in subjectivity theory and based on qualitative methods including participant observation and semi-structured interviews, the research focuses on tourists as "mobile subjects" and explores how their short-term involvement in tourism-based community development can contribute to the regeneration of village subject structures. Findings reveal that tourists demonstrate distinct characteristics of subjectivity through their participation: 1) self-driven motivation and active practice rooted in personal interest, cultural identification, and value pursuit; 2) dynamic role negotiation between being service providers and experience seekers; and 3) the accumulation of subjective experience through repeated participation and cross-regional mobility. Based on these insights, the study proposes a threefold mechanism for village subject regeneration: first, the institutional empowerment of tourists through the creation of short-term participation platforms to activate and convert their subjectivity into localized support resources; second, the dynamic balancing of service obligations and individual experience needs through flexible role coordination; and third, the spatial and temporal extension of tourist subjectivity as a foundation for building regenerative support networks across regions.
hollowing-out / mobile subjects / subjectivity / host-guest identity transformation / rural tourism
| 1 |
刘彦随, 刘玉, 翟荣新. 中国农村空心化的地理学研究与整治实践[J]. 地理学报, 2009, 64 (10): 1193- 1202.
|
| 2 |
刘祖云, 姜姝. "城归": 乡村振兴中"人的回归"[J]. 农业经济问题, 2019 (2): 43- 52.
|
| 3 |
焦兴涛, 王比, 刘向晖. "同意、同向、共生、共享"构建艺术乡建"新主体": 以重庆璧山莲花穴艺术村落活化项目为例[J]. 装饰, 2022 (4): 12- 18.
|
| 4 |
袁剑, 吴重庆. 青年县域城乡流动及对乡村振兴的参与研究[J]. 青年探索, 2022 (1): 20- 29.
|
| 5 |
王云龙. 从"游走"到"入乡": 数字游民的乡村嵌入与重塑——基于浙江省A县的经验考察[J]. 中国青年研究, 2024 (6): 68-77, 67.
|
| 6 |
竹田茉耶. 観光まちづくり論再考——観光まちづくりの中?概念としての「地域の主体性」[J]. 大阪観光大学研究論集, 2024, 24, 23- 31.
|
| 7 |
贾衍菊, 赵金凤, 祝铭瑶. 社会资本与乡村旅游价值共创: 地方依恋的中介作用[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2024, 38 (11): 187- 196.
|
| 8 |
李丽娟. 旅游体验价值共创影响机理研究: 以北京香山公园为例[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2012, 28 (3): 96- 100.
|
| 9 |
杨洋, 徐颖儿, 蔡溢, 等. 民族旅游社区游客价值共创行为的过程机制: 贵州西江苗寨的案例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2024, 38 (3): 182- 190.
|
| 10 |
涂红伟, 张志慧, 李显惠. 主客积极接触对旅游心理疲劳的预防效应与实现机制[J]. 旅游学刊, 2024, 39 (9): 135- 150.
|
| 11 |
刘少艾, 林迎星. 游客参与、真实性感知与非遗文化旅游价值开发[J]. 福建论坛(人文社会科学版), 2020 (12): 99- 108.
|
| 12 |
赵书虹, 孔营营, 李晓光. 民族旅游村寨人居环境的多元共治机制[J]. 中国生态旅游, 2025, 15 (1): 160- 172.
|
| 13 |
増田寛也. 地方消滅: 東京一極集中が招く人口急減[M]. 東京: 中央公論新社, 2014: 11- 36.
|
| 14 |
橋本行史. 関係人口概念の考察: 観光まちづくりとの関わりを中心として[J]. 政策創造研究, 2022, 16, 55- 84.
|
| 15 |
西村幸夫. 観光まちづくりとは何か——まち自慢からはじまる地域マネジメント[M]//西村幸夫编著. 観光まちづくり——まち自慢からはじまる地域マネジメント. 京都: 学芸出版社, 2009: 9-28.
Nishimura Yukio. What is Tourism-based Community Development: Regional management that starts with the pride of the community[M]//Nishimura Yukio (Ed. ). What is Tourism-based Community Development: Regional Management that Starts with the Pride of the Community. Kyoto: Gakugei Shuppansha, 2009: 9-28.
|
| 16 |
安村克己. 観光まちづくりの力学: 観光と地域の社会学的研究[M]. 東京: 学文社, 2006: 43- 64.
|
| 17 |
四本幸夫. 観光まちづくり研究に対する権力概念を中心とした社会学的批判[J]. 観光学評論, 2014, 2 (1): 67- 82.
|
| 18 |
藤井紘司. 観光まちづくりをめぐる地域の内発性と外部アクター: 竹富公民館の選択と大規模リゾート[J]. 観光学評論, 2018, 6 (1): 3- 17.
|
| 19 |
赵月枝, 沙垚. 被争议的与被遮蔽的: 重新发现乡村振兴的主体[J]. 江淮论坛, 2018 (6): 34- 40.
|
| 20 |
王晓升. 世界、身体和主体: 关于主体性的再思考[J]. 中国社会科学, 2021 (12): 176-198, 203.
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
孙九霞. 乡村旅游视域下传统村落的主体性消解与重构[J]. 湖北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 42 (3): 119- 128.
|
| 25 |
张凌媛, 孙九霞. 乡村主体性及其对乡村地域系统的影响: 以广西阳朔县为例[J]. 地理学报, 2025, 80 (2): 453- 474.
|
| 26 |
吴祖泉. 建设主体视角的乡村建设思考[J]. 城市规划, 2015, 39 (11): 85- 91.
|
| 27 |
石塚雅明. まちづくりの構想[M]//西村幸夫. まちづくり学——アイディアから実現までのプロセス. 東京: 朝倉書店, 2007: 1-25.
Masaaki Ishizuka. The concept of tourism-based community development[M]//Nishimura N (Ed. ). Studies on Tourism-based Community Development: From ideas to implementation. Tokyo: Asakura Publishing, 2007: 1-25.
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
岡村祐, 野原卓, 西村幸夫. 我が国における「観光まちづくり」の歴史的展開: 1960年代以降の「まちづくり」が「観光」へ近接する側面に着目して[J]. 観光科学研究, 2009 (2): 21- 30.
|
| 37 |
李卫朝, 王维. 依托农民主体性建设, 切实推动乡村全面振兴[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 36 (3): 72- 80.
|
| 38 |
刘婷婷, 马凌, 保继刚. 旅游中的地方营造: 缘起、内涵及应用[J]. 人文地理, 2022, 37 (2): 1- 12.
|
感谢京都大学人间·环境学研究科小岛泰雄教授对本篇论文在研究思路构建以及理论框架完善方面给予的悉心指导与宝贵帮助。同时,谨向本刊编辑及审稿人致以诚挚谢意,感谢他们提出的建设性意见与细致修改建议。
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |