多情境下城市时空间行为的社会分异——以北京不同住房来源居民为例

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.06.005

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (40742 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要近年来，居民时空间行为的社会分异已成为学者们广泛关注的话题。然而，已有关于居民时空间行为的社会分异研究中，缺少对于居民活动情境的社会分异的研究。因此，本研究基于时间地理学中对人类活动的情境嵌入性与情境的不同维度的相关理论，以北京清河街道为例，分析不同住房来源居民在日常情境、地理情境和社会情境下的时空间行为的社会分异，尝试从多个情境维度拓展对时空间行为社会分异的理解。研究发现，市场性住房居民“朝九晚五”的活动特征明显，活动同伴选择外向性突出；单位性住房居民职住相对接近，在社区空间内分配时间最长且活动目的多样；安置性住房居民活动较为分散，地理情境与社会情境都呈现出“家庭内向性”特征；保障性住房居民非工作活动的“滞后性”明显，对社区空间的时间分配总体较低。除住房来源因素与个人社会经济因素外，建成环境因素对于居民对社区空间的使用有显著影响。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张雪
	李彦熙
	柴彦威

关键词 ：社会分异, 时空间行为, 多情境, 住房来源, 北京

Abstract：In recent years, social segregation of residents' spatio-temporal behavior has received widespread concern. Under the background of urban transformation and reconstruction and the rapid change in social and household organization, the contexts of residents' daily life become more and more complicated, leading to more significant differences among groups. Various researches have focused on the differences of the spatio-temporal behavior of urban residents, but have paid little attention to the complex contexts of daily life. Analysis of complex contexts of residents' spatio-temporal behavior helps to deepen our understanding on social segregation. This study first introduces the embeddedness of contexts of human behavior and meanings of different contexts. Using a case study in Qinghe District, Beijing, this study describes the social segregation of spatio-temporal behavior of residents in different types of housing in 3 contexts:Everyday context, geographical context and social context. We find that residents of market housing show a nine-to-five activity pattern, and have an extraverted social context of their daily life. Residents of resettlement housing show scattered daily activity pattern, while the geographical context and social context of their daily life are more family-introverted. Residents of affordable housing have postponed non-work activities when compared to other groups and spend less time in their neighborhood area.

Key words： social segregation spatio-temporal behavior complex contexts types of housing Beijing

收稿日期: 2021-03-16

PACS:

K901

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（42001186，42071203，41871146）；教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（20YJCZH234）

通讯作者: 柴彦威(1964-),男,甘肃会宁人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要研究方向为时间地理学、行为地理学、城市时空行为规划。E-mail:chyw@pku.edu.cn。 E-mail: chyw@pku.edu.cn

作者简介: 张雪(1989-),女,河北沧州人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为行为地理学、时间地理学、城市与区域规划。E-mail:zhangxue@fjnu.edu.cn。

引用本文:

张雪, 李彦熙, 柴彦威. 多情境下城市时空间行为的社会分异——以北京不同住房来源居民为例[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(6): 39-52. ZHANG Xue, LI Yan-xi, CHAI Yan-wei. SOCIAL SEGREGATION OF SPATIO-TEMPORAL BEHAVIOR OF RESIDENTS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF HOUSING IN COMPLEX CONTEXTS: A CASE STUDY OF BEIJING. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 36(6): 39-52.

链接本文:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.06.005 或 http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V36/I6/39

[1]	Wang D G, Li F, Chai Y W. Activity spaces and sociospatial segregation in Beijing[J]. Urban Geography, 2012,33(2):256-277.
[2]	Wang D G, Li F. Daily activity space and exposure:A comparative study of Hong Kong's public and private housing residents' segregation in daily life[J]. Cities, 2016,59:148-155.
[3]	Park Y M, Kwan M -P. Multi-contextual segregation and environmental justice research:Toward fine-scale spatiotemporal approaches[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017,14(10):1205.
[4]	Ellegård K,张艳,蒋晨,等.复杂情境中的日常活动可视化与应用研究[J].人文地理,2016,31(5):39-46.[Ellegård K, Zhang Yan, Jiang Chen, et al. Visualization and applications of daily activities in the complex context[J]. Human Geography, 2016,31(5):39-46.]
[5]	Kwan M -P. Beyond space (as we knew it):Toward temporally integrated geographies of segregation, health, and accessibility:Space time integration in geography and GIScience[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2013,103(5):1078-1086.
[6]	Ellegård K, Cooper M. Complexity in daily life-a 3D-visualization showing activity patterns in their contexts[J]. Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 2004,1(1):37-59.
[7]	柴彦威,等.城市地理学思想与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:1-14.[Chai Yanwei, et al. Thoughts and Method on Urban Geography[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2012:1-14.]
[8]	Hägerstrand T. What about people in regional science?[J]. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1970,24(1):6-21.
[9]	吴缚龙.中国城市社区的类型及其特质[J].城市问题,1992(5):24-27.[Wu Fulong. The types and characteristics of urban communities in China[J]. Urban Problems, 1992(5):24-27.]
[10]	张雪,柴彦威.北京不同住房来源居民活动——移动模式的社会分异[J].城市发展研究,2019,26(12):17-27,2.[Zhang Xue, Chai Yanwei. Activity-travel-pattern-based social segregation research of residents of different types of housing:A case study in Beijing[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2019,26(12):17-27,2.]
[11]	Logan J R, Alba R D, McNulty T, et al. Making a place in the metropolis:Locational attainment in cities and suburbs[J]. Demography, 1996,33(4):443-453.
[12]	Massey D S, Rothwell J, Domina T. The changing bases of segregation in the United States[J]. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2009,626(1):74-90.
[13]	顾朝林,王法辉,刘贵利.北京城市社会区分析[J].地理学报,2003, 58(6):917-926.[Gu Chaolin, Wang Fahui, Liu Guili. Study on urban social areas in Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003,58(6):917-926.]
[14]	张纯,易成栋,宋彦.北京市职住空间关系特征及变化研究——基于第五、六次人口普查和2001、2008年经济普查数据的实证分析[J]. 城市规划,2016,40(10):59-64.[Zhang Chun, Yi Chengdong, Song Yan. Characteristics of job-housing spatial relationship and changes in Beijing:An empirical study based on data from the 5th, 6th population census and economy censes in 2001 and 2008[J]. City Planning Review, 2016,40(10):59-64.]
[15]	柴彦威,张艳,刘志林.职住分离的空间差异性及其影响因素研究[J].地理学报,2011,66(2):157-166.[Chai Yanwei, Zhang Yan, Liu Zhilin. Spatial differences of home-work separation and the impacts of housing policy and urban sprawl[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011,66(2):157-166.]
[16]	张纯,李晓宁,满燕云.北京城市保障性住房居民的就医可达性研究——基于GIS网络分析方法[J].人文地理,2017,32(2):59-64.[Zhang Chun, Li Xiaoning, Man Yanyun. Accessibility to health care service of the affordable housing residents in Beijing:Base on GIS network analysis[J]. Human Geography, 2017,32(2):59-64.]
[17]	Hägerstrand T. Time-geography:Focus on the corporeality of man, society, and environment[J]. The Science and Praxis of Complexity, 1985:193-216.
[18]	Krantz H. Matter that matters:A study of household routines in a process of changing water and sanitation arrangements[J]. Oceanografi Hydrologi Vattenresurser, 2005,14(5):734-735.
[19]	Ellegård K, Hägerstrand T, Lenntorp B. Activity organization and the generation of daily travel:Two future alternatives[J]. Economic Geography, 1977,53(2):126-152.
[20]	Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity[M]. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 1990:55-60.
[21]	关美宝,申悦,赵莹,等.时间地理学研究中的GIS方法:人类行为模式的地理计算与地理可视化[J].国际城市规划,2010,25(6):18-26.[Mei-Po Kwan, Shen Yue, Zhao Ying, et al. GIS methods in timegeographic research:Geocomputation and geovisualization of human activity patterns[J]. Urban Planning International, 2010,25(6):18-26.]
[22]	Lenntorp B. Time-geography-at the end of its beginning[J]. Geojournal, 1999,48(3):155-158.
[23]	Hägerstrand T. The two vistas[J]. Geografiska Annaler, 2004,86(4):315-323.
[24]	Hägerstrand T. Diorama, path and project[J]. Tijdschriftvoor Economischeen Sociale Geografie, 1982,73(6):323-339.
[25]	Ellegård K, Palm J. Who Is Behaving? Consequences for energy policy of concept confusion[J]. Energies, 2015,8(8):7618-7637.
[26]	Kwan M -P. From oral histories to visual narratives:Representing the post-September 11 experiences of the Muslim women in the United States[J]. Social and Cultural Geography, 2008,9(6):653-669.
[27]	陶印华.日常移动性视角下环境污染暴露与居民心理健康的关系研究[D].北京:北京大学,2019:88-90.[Tao Yinhua. Relationships between Environmental Pollution Exposure and Mental Health:The Lens of Individual Daily Mobility[D]. Beijing:Peking University, 2019:88-90.]
[28]	McQuoid J, Dijst M. Bringing emotions to time geography:The case of mobilities of poverty[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2012,23:26-34.
[29]	Zhang X, Wang J, Kwan M P, et al. Reside nearby, behave apart? Activity-space-based segregation among residents of various types of housing in Beijing, China[J]. Cities, 2019,88:166-180.
[30]	邹思聪,张姗琪,甄峰.基于居民时空行为的社区日常活动空间测度及活力影响因素研究——以南京市沙洲、南苑街道为例[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(4):580-596.[Zou Sicong, Zhang Shanqi, Zhen Feng. Measurement of community daily activity space and influencing factors of vitality based on residents' spatiotemporal behavior:Taking Shazhou and Nanyuan streets in Nanjing as examples[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021,40(4):580-596.]
[31]	赵莹.基于个体行为的城市居民活动空间研究[D].北京:北京大学, 2013:109-123.[Zhao Ying. Spatial Space of Urban Residents Based on Individual Behavior[D]. Beijing:Peking University, 2013:109-123.]