FIELD WEAVING: A NEW DISCUSSION ON THE RENEWAL THEORY OF TRADITIONAL TOURISM VILLAGES
ZHOU Kun1,2, WANG Jin2
1. College of Landscape Architecture and Tourism, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China;
2. Tourism College, Chongqing University of Arts and Science, Chongqing 402160, China
Abstract：Weaving theory is a classical theory in the field of urban planning, which is often used to solve the problem of urban renewal. The basic theory of traditional village renewal is still controversial. Using the method of theoretical deduction and conceptual interpretation, this paper introduces the weaving theory and field theory, and discusses the renewal strategy of traditional tourism villages from the perspective of field weaving. It is found that tourism reconstructs the logic of traditional village renewal, and the "fragmentation" provides the complex and contradictory conditions for the application of weaving theory. The field of traditional tourism villages can be deconstructed into three subfields: Tourism, life and production; Capital differentiation and competition increase the field pressure and cause field imbalance. The field weaving of traditional tourism villages is the renewal theory of protecting village culture and promoting social development with the carrier of material and non-material culture, the basic content of cultural space renewal and relationship space adjustment, and the scientific adjustment strategy. The basic contents of field weaving include cultural field weaving and relational field weaving. It is believed that capital adjustment can be used as one of the technical tools of field weaving. Capital instruments include social capital, economic capital and cultural capital. Social capital focuses on empowering and restricting rights, and on the rebalancing social capital, maintains the rights of vulnerable groups in village renewal, and gives the government more control power. Economic capital is used to adjust and supplement the traditional village field of tourism, which is mainly used to supplement the relationship field. Cultural capital is embodied in the community-based cultural mining and application, especially the cultural mapping tools.
周坤, 王进. 场域织补：旅游传统村落更新理论新议[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(4): 17-22.
ZHOU Kun, WANG Jin. FIELD WEAVING: A NEW DISCUSSION ON THE RENEWAL THEORY OF TRADITIONAL TOURISM VILLAGES. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 35(4): 17-22.
仇保兴.深刻认识传统村落的功能[N]. 人民日报,2012-11-29(7).[Qiu Baoxing. A deep understanding of the functions of traditional villages[N]. People's Daily, 2012-11-29(7).]
[2]
叶建平,朱雪梅,林垚广,等.传统村落微更新与社区复兴:粤北石塘的乡村振兴实践[J]. 城市发展研究,2018,25(7):41-45,73,161.[Ye Jianping, Zhu Xuemei, Lin Yaoguang, et al. Micro-regeneration and revitalization of traditional village:In case of Shitang village, northern Guangdong[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2018,25(7):41-45, 73,161.]
[3]
Wilson O J. Village renewal and rural development in the former German Democratic Republic[J]. GeoJournal, 1998,46(3):247-255.
[4]
Jasenka K. Toward the discussion on village renewal in Croatia[J]. Zeitschrift Für Kulturtechnik und Landentwicklung, 2000,41(5):202-205.
[5]
Zasada I, Piorr A. The role of local framework conditions for the adoption of rural development policy:An example of diversification, tourism development and village renewal in Brandenburg, Germany[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015,59(12):82-93.
[6]
Jaszczak A, ?ukovskis J, Antolak M. The role of rural renewal program in planning of the village public spaces:Systematic approach[J]. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 2017,39(4):432-441.
[7]
张子琪,裘知,王竹.基于类型学方法的传统乡村聚落演进机制及更新策略探索[J]. 建筑学报,2017(S2):7-12.[Zhang Ziqi, Qiu Zhi, Wang Zhu. Exploration on the evolutionary mechanism and improvement strategy of traditional rural settlement based on the methods of typology[J]. Journal of Architecture, 2017(S2):7-12.]
[8]
孔翔,吴栋,张纪娴.社区参与模式下的传统村落旅游空间生产及影响初探——基于苏州东山陆巷古村的调研[J]. 世界地理研究, 2019,28(6):156-165.[Kong Xiang, Wu Dong, Zhang Jixian. The production of traditional village tourism space under the mode of community participation and its influence:Based on field work in Luxiang ancient village in Dongshan, Suzhou[J]. World Regional Studies, 2019,28(6):156-165.]
[9]
张娟,王茂军.乡村绅士化进程中旅游型村落生活空间重塑特征研究——以北京爨底下村为例[J]. 人文地理,2017,32(2):137-144.[Zhang Juan, Wang Maojun. The characteristics of the life space remodeling of tourism village during rural gentrification:The case of Cuandixia in Beijing[J]. Human Geography, 2017,32(2):137-144.]
[10]
徐斌,周晓宇,刘雷.大城市近郊乡村更新策略——以杭州西湖区绕城村为例[J]. 中国园林,2018,34(12):63-67.[Xu Bin, Zhou Xiaoyu, Liu Lei. Urban renewal strategy in rural areas:Taking Raocheng village of Westlake district in Hangzhou as an example[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2018,34(12):63-67.]
[11]
李竹,刘晶晶,王嘉峻.乡村振兴下的村落公共空间重塑——以李巷老建筑改造为例[J]. 建筑学报,2018(12):10-19.[Li Zhu, Liu Jingjing, Wang Jiajun. Reshaping public space in the village under rural revitalization:A case study of old building renovation at Lixiang village[J]. Architectural Journal, 2018(12):10-19.]
[12]
徐春成,万志琴.传统村落保护基本思路论辩[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2015(6):58-64.[Xu Chuncheng, Wan Zhiqin. Argumentation on basic thoughts of traditional village protection[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2015(6):58-64.]
[13]
柯林·罗,弗瑞德·科特.拼贴城市[M]. 童明,译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003:126-228.[Rowe C, Koetter F. Collage City[M]. Tong Ming, trans. Beijing:China Construction Industry Press, 2003:126-228.]
[14]
张晗斯.基于织补理论的大连造船厂地段城市更新研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学,2014:7.[Zhang Hansi. Research on Dalian Shipyard Urban Area Renewal Based on Weaving Theory[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2014:7.]
[15]
Gobel D. Interweaving country and city in the urban design of Savannah, Georgia[J]. Global Environment, 2016,9(1):108-148.
[16]
Gil M P. Wild city:MVRDV-weaving nature and the urban[J]. Architectural Design, 2013,83(3):48-55.
[17]
郑萍.旅游空间中的传统与现代性——傣族曼龙村寨的旅游人类学分析[J]. 河北学刊,2008,28(2):142-146.[Zheng Ping. Tradition and modernity in the tourism space of Manlong village[J]. Hebei Academic Journal, 2008,28(2):142-146.]
[18]
张东辉,陈敏.城市肌理织补策略于一元片街区保护的应用[J]. 山西建筑, 2008,34(14):35-36.[Zhang Donghui, Chen Min. Application of the mending strategy of the city texture in Yiyuan road district protection[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2008,34(14):35-36.]
[19]
蔡晶晶,吴希.乡村旅游对农户生计脆弱性影响评价——基于社会-生态耦合分析视角[J]. 农业现代化研究,2018,39(4):654-664.[Cai Jingjing, Wu Xi. The impacts of rural tourism on the vulnerability of farmers' livelihood:From the perspective of coupled socialecological system[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2018,39(4):654-664.]
[20]
郭文,杨桂华.民族旅游村寨仪式实践演变中神圣空间的生产——对翁丁佤寨村民日常生活的观察[J]. 旅游学刊,2018,33(5):92-103.[Guo Wen, Yang Guihua. Sacred space production on the evolution of ethnic tourism village ritual practices:Based on the observation of Wengding Va villagers' daily life[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2018,33(5):92-103.]
[21]
何旭,杨海娟,王晓雅.乡村农户旅游适应效果-模式及其影响因素——以西安市和咸阳市17个案例村为例[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(9):2330-2345.[He Xu, Yang Haijuan, Wang Xiaoya. Adaptation effect, mode and influencing factors of rural tourism:A case study of 17 typical villages in cities of Xi'an and Xianyang[J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(9):2330-2345.]
[22]
皮埃尔·布尔迪厄,华康德.反思社会学导引[M]. 李猛,李康,译.北京:商务印书馆,2015:15,130.[Bourdieu P, Wacquant L. Introspective Sociological Guidance[M]. Li Meng, Li Kang, trans. Beijing:Commercial Press, 2015:15,130.]
[23]
周坤.地方资本:一个乡村旅游研究的新概念[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019,46(6):73-80.[Zhou Kun. Place capital:A new concept of rural tourism research[J]. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019,46(6):73-80.]
[24]
程思远.织补城市——专访清华大学建筑学院张杰教授[N]. 中华建筑报,2012-07-17(14).[Cheng Siyuan. Weaving city:An exclusive interview with Professor Zhang Jie, School of architecture, Tsinghua University[N]. China Architecture Daily, 2012-07-17(14).]
[25]
程裕祯.中国文化要略[M]. 北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2003:2-3.[Cheng Yuzhen. A Brief Introduction to Chinese Culture[M]. Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2003:2-3.]
[26]
周坤,颜珂,王进.场所精神重解:兼论建筑遗产的保护与再利用[J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2015,42(3):67-72.[Zhou Kun, Yan Ke, Wang Jin. The reinterpretation of place spirit:On the protection and reuse of architectural heritage[J]. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2015,42(3):67-72.]
[27]
王林平,高云涌.历史唯物主义的空间概念与资本拓扑学——从"对《资本论》 的越界阐释" 谈起[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,21(5):33-38.[Wang Linping, Gao Yunyong. The space concept of historical materialism and capital topology:A discussion beginning from the cross-border explanation of capital[J]. Journal of Harbin University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2019,21(5):33-38.]
[28]
王进,周坤.旅游扶贫中贫困人口的权力认知研究——基于"赋权-限权" 角度[J]. 旅游科学,2017,31(5):32-45.[Wang Jin, Zhou Kun. A study on power cognition of the poor in pro-poor tourism:Based on "the empowerment and power restriction" perspective[J]. Tourism Science, 2017,31(5):32-45.]
