老旧社区的具身实践与地方认同&mdash;&mdash;基于超越表征的整合视角

操小晋; 刘春卉; 余思奇

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.02.009

PDF(25694 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2) : 69-78. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.02.009

社会

老旧社区的具身实践与地方认同——基于超越表征的整合视角

操小晋¹, 刘春卉², 余思奇³

作者信息 +

THE EMBODIED PRACTICE AND PLACE IDENTITY IN OLD COMMUNITIES: AN INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE BASED ON REPRESENTATION AND NON-REPRESENTATION

CAO Xiao-jin¹, LIU Chun-hui², YU Si-qi³

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

以徐州老旧社区为例，采用参与式观察和深度访谈的质性方法，从超越表征的整合视角探究具身实践与地方认同的互馈机制，以回应表征忽视情境和非表征难以脱离再现的批判。研究发现：①居民在静态实践或视听触等感官系统的动态建构中感知人地关系，身体本身成为地方隐喻的载体。②社区与个人尺度的地方认同消解与建构引发实践场景的转变，“褶子”除表征具身实践外，还拓展到具有情感价值的空间要素。③当作为“褶子”单元的具身实践和场所象征累积为再现活力的“湍流”，将重建社区的社会性联结并激发居民的实践意愿。超越表征的解释路径强调对日常生活的尊重和地方意义的培育，这有助于社区治理与地方认同的彼此增强和转化。

Abstract

Taking the typical old community in Xuzhou as an example, this paper uses qualitative methods such as participatory observation, video recording and in-depth interview to deal with the argument that decontext-free criticism of representations and that non-representations are hard to get rid of. The reciprocal mechanism between embodied practice and local identity is explored from a comprehensive perspective beyond representation. The research found that: 1) In scenes ranging from individual to community scale, such as self-living, hiding at home, parent-child coexistence and daily gathering, residents adopt static practices with incomplete consciousness or perceive human-land relationship with sensory systems such as audiovisual touch. 2) The acquaintance society in traditional communities is gradually dissolved under the flow of modernity, and the intimate space carrying the neighborhood relationship is constantly eroded. 3) On the one hand, the local identity mechanism of the old community is shaped by the physical practice of residents' daily life.

导出引用

操小晋, 刘春卉, 余思奇. 老旧社区的具身实践与地方认同——基于超越表征的整合视角[J]. 人文地理. 2023, 38(2): 69-78 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.02.009

CAO Xiao-jin, LIU Chun-hui, YU Si-qi. THE EMBODIED PRACTICE AND PLACE IDENTITY IN OLD COMMUNITIES: AN INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE BASED ON REPRESENTATION AND NON-REPRESENTATION[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2023, 38(2): 69-78 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.02.009

中图分类号： K901.6 D669.3

参考文献

[1] 余文婷".地方"理论在中国的演化与发展评述[J].地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(2):100-105,113.[Yu Wenting. A review on the evolution and development of "Place" theory in China[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2021,37(2):100-105,113.]
[2] 胡宪洋,白凯.拉萨八廓街地方性的游客认同建构[J].地理学报, 2015,70(10):1632-1649.[Hu Xianyang, Bai Kai. The construction of tourists'identity of Barkhor street in Lhasa[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(10):1632-1649.]
[3] 庄春萍,张建新.地方认同:环境心理学视角下的分析[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(9):1387-1396.[Zhuang Chunping, Zhang Jianxin. Place identity:Analysis from environmental psychology perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2011,19(9):1387-1396]
[4] Proshansky H M. The city and self-identity[J]. Environment and Behavior, 1978,10(2):147-169.
[5] 杨立国,刘沛林,林琳.传统村落景观基因在地方认同建构中的作用效应——以侗族村寨为例[J].地理科学,2015,35(5):593-598.[Yang Liguo, Liu Peilin, Lin Lin. The effect of traditional village landscape genes in construction place identity:Taking the Dong Minority village as an example[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(5):593-598.]
[6] Hernández B, Hidalgo M C, Salazar-Laplace M E, et al. Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2007,27(4):310-319.
[7] Williams D R, Patterson M E, Roggenbuck J W, et al. Beyond the commodity metaphor:Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place[J]. Leisure Sciences, 1992,14(1):29-46.
[8] Grant P R. Sustaining a strong cultural and national identity:The acculturation of immigrants and second-generation Canadians of Asian and African descent[J]. Journal of International Migration & Integration, 2007,8(1):89-116.
[9] 朱竑,刘博.地方感、地方依恋与地方认同等概念的辨析及研究启示[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011(1):1-8.[Zhu Hong, Liu Bo. Concepts analysis and research implications:Sense of place, place attachment and place identity[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2011(1):1-8.]
[10] 黄敏瑶,张敏.具身实践下的地方认知:非表征理论与南京马拉松[J].地理研究,2019,38(6):1355-1366.[Huang Minyao, Zhang Min. Cognition of place in embodied practice:Non-representational theory and Nanjing Marathon[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(6):1355-1366.]
[11] 麦永雄.论德勒兹生态美学思想:地理哲学、生机论与机器论[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,28(6):116-123,157.[Mai Yongxiong. On Deleuze's ecological aesthetics:Geophilosophy, vitalism and the machinism[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2013,28(6):116-123,157.]
[12] 马凌,张媛媛,朱竑,等.城市行政区划调整背景下城郊居民地方认同的重构与机制研究——以广州番禺小龙村为例[J].地理研究,2019, 38(8):2044-2057.[Ma ling, Zhang Yuanyuan, Zhu Hong, et al. Reconstruction of suburban residents'place identity under urban administrative division adjustment:A case study of Xiaolong village, Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(8):2044-2057.]
[13] Lorimer H. Cultural geography:Non-representational conditions and concerns[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2008, 32(4):551-559.
[14] Thrift N. Spatial Formations[M]. New York:Sage Publications, 1996:235-260.
[15] 宋美杰.非表征理论与媒介研究:新视域与新想象[J].新闻与传播研究,2020,27(3):86-97,127-128.[Song Meijie. Non-representational theory and media research:New horizons and new imagimation[J]. Journalism & Communication, 2020,27(3):86-97,127-128.]
[16] 刘万瑚".回到事物本身"与"面向事物本身"——胡塞尔与海德格尔的现象学方法之争[J].哲学动态, 2019, 41(11):84-91.[Liu Wanhu. "Auf die Sachen selbst zurückgehen" and "Zu den Sachen selbst":Husserl and Heidegger's different methods of phenomenology[J]. Philosophical Trends, 2019,41(11):84-91.]
[17] 陶伟,王绍续,朱竑.身体、身体观以及人文地理学对身体的研究[J].地理研究,2015,34(6):1173-1187.[Tao Wei, Wang Shaoxu, Zhu Hong. The body, the view of body, and the study of body in human geography[J]. Geographical Research, 2015,34(6):1173-1187.]
[18] Andrews G J. Co-creating health's lively, moving frontiers:Brief observations on the facets and possibilities of non-representational theory[J]. Health & Place, 2014,30:165-170.
[19] Anderson B. Affective atmospheres[J]. Emotion, Space & Society, 2009,2(2):77-81.
[20] Johnson J L. Non-representational theory:Space, politics, affect[J]. Emotion, Space & Society, 2011,4(3):195-196.
[21] Pile S. Emotions and affect in recent human geography[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2010,35(1):5-20.
[22] 吕飞,王悦.企业型单位大院社区更新策略初探[J].规划师,2020, 36(18):83-88.[Lv Fei, Wang Yue. Enterprise Danwei community renovation strategies[J]. Planners, 2020,36(18):83-88.]
[23] 郑晓东,黄凡,马好梦.场域理论下社区微治理的生成与运行机制研究[J].治理研究,2021,37(1):59-69.[Zheng Xiaodong, Huang Fan, Ma Haomeng. Research on the formation and operation mechanism of community microgovernance field theory[J]. Governance Studies, 2021,37(1):59-69.]
[24] 李彦熙,柴彦威,张艳.家庭企划情境下郊区居民一周活动时空特征分析——以北京上地-清河为例[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(4):597-606.[Li Yanxi, Chai Yanwei, Zhang Yan. Weekly spatiotemporal behavior of suburban residents in family context:A case study of the Shangdi-Qinghe area in Beijing[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021,40(4):597-606.]
[25] 宗成峰.中国"互联网+ "城市社区治理:挑战、趋势与模式[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(10):23-27,46.[Zong Chengfeng. China's internet plus city community governance:Challenges, trend and models[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020,27(10):23-27,46.]
[26] 端木一博,柴彦威.社区设施供给与居民需求的时空间匹配研究——以北京清上园社区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2018,37(6):76-81.[Duanmu Yibo, Chai Yanwei. Space-time matching between community facilities and resident's demand:A case of Qingshangyuan community in Beijing[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2018,37(6):76-81.]
[27] 唐燕.新冠肺炎疫情防控中的社区治理挑战应对:基于城乡规划与公共卫生视角[J].南京社会科学,2020(3):8-14,27.[Tang Yan. Challenges and responses of community governance in the prevention and control of novel coronary pneumonia:From perspectives of urban-rural planning and public health[J]. Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences, 2020(3):8-14,27.]
[28] 艾少伟,周文凤,罗冰,等.城市少数民族社区地方认同的消解与重构[J].人文地理,2020,35(1):28-35,122.[Ai Shaowei, Zhou Wenfeng, Luo Bing, et al. Dissolution and reconstruction of place identity of urban minority communities[J]. Human Geography, 2020, 35(1):28-35,122.]
[29] 王孟永.社区认同、环境情感结构与城市形态发生学机制研究——基于上海曹杨新村的测量与评价[J].城市规划,2018,42(12):43-54.[Wang Mengyong. Research on community identity, emotional structure of the environment, and urban morphogenetic mechanism:Based on the measurement and evaluation of Caoyang Xincun in Shanghai[J]. City Planning Review, 2018,42(12):43-54.]
[30] Portegijs E, Rantakokko M, Mikkola T M, et al. Association between physical performance and sense of autonomy in outdoor activities and life-space mobility in community-dwelling older people[J]. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2014,62(4):615-621.
[31] 成志芬,周尚意.历史文化街区表征与非表征之间的关联——以北京历史文化街区文化意义变化分析为例[J].人文地理,2021, 36(2):127-135.[Cheng Zhifen, Zhou Shangyi. The relationship between the representation and non-reprsentation in historical and cultural blocks:A case study of the cultural meaning change of Xisi historical and cultural block in Beijing[J]. Human Geography, 2021, 36(2):127-135.]
[32] Helbrecht I. Bare geographies in knowledge societies:Creative cities as text and piece of art:Two eyes, one vision[J]. Built Environment, 2004,30(3):194-203.
[33] 谢泳涛,朱竑,陈淳.儿童视角下的广州市儿童公园游憩体验研究[J].旅游学刊,2020,35(12):81-91.[Xie Yongtao, Zhu Hong, Chen Chun. Recreation experiences of children in Guangzhou children's park from the children's perspectives[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2020, 35(12):81-91.]
[34] 蔡少燕,陶伟.从漠视到觉醒:西方旅游研究对身体的再认识[J].人文地理,2019,34(4):1-12.[Cai Shaoyan, Tao Wei. From indifference to awakening:The rethink of Western tourism studies on body[J]. Human Geography, 2019,34(4):1-12.]
[35] 宋秀葵.段义孚的地方空间思想研究[J].人文地理,2014,29(4):19-23,51.[Song Xiukui. On Yifu Tuan's thought of" Place and Space"[J]. Human Geography, 2014,29(4):19-23,51.]
[36] Dennis S, Warin M. Honeyed tongues and hostile intimacy:Engaging trauma across migrant worlds[J]. Emotion, Space and Society, 2010,3(1):50-55.
[37] 郭文.空间意义的叠写与地方认同——中国最后一个原始部落翁丁案例[J].地理研究,2020,39(11):2449-2465.[Guo Wen. The superscription of spatial meaning and local identity of the last primitive tribe of Wengding village, China[J]. Geographical Research, 2020,39(11):2449-2465.]
[38] Thrift N. Steps to an Ecology of Place[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press, 1999:295-322.
[39] Nash C. Progress reports, Performativity in practice:Some recent work in cultural geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2000,24(4):653-664.
[40] Helbrecht I. Bare geographies in knowledge societies:Creative cities as text and piece of art:Two eyes, one vision[J]. Built Environment, 2004,30(3):194-203.
[41] 亨利·列斐伏尔.日常生活批判(第三卷)[M].叶齐茂,倪晓晖,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017:642-653.[Lefebvre H. Critique of Everyday Life (Volume 3)[M]. Ye Qimao, Ni Xiaohui, trans. Beijing:Social Sciences Academic Press (China), 2017:642-653.]
[42] 杨宇振.发现列斐伏尔:规划日常生活的时空革命[J].城市规划,2021, 45(4):84-93.[Yang Yuzhen. Discovering Henri Lefebvre:A timespatial revolution for planning everyday life[J]. City Planning Review, 2021,45(4):84-93.]