RESEARCH ON THE REPRODUCTION OF RURAL LANDSCAPE UNDER THE BACKGROUND OF ART INTERVENTION
ZENG Li1, LV Guang-yao2, AN Ning3
1. School of Fine Arts, Huaiyin Normal University, Huai'an 223300, China;
2. School of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture Science, South Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China;
3. Centre for Asian Geography Studies/School of Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
Abstract：In the most recent years, rural revitalization has become the most top prioritized work for Chinese government, and rural studies have therefore become an unprecedently welcomed issue in Chinese academia. In an era when rural topics are generally concerned, the current studies on rural landscape have been mainly focusing on rural materiality, while interpretations extending from material forms to the social and cultural aspects as well as its complex power relations of the rural have been apparently under-explored, not even studies on art- led rural development. Taking Shuanglang village, Dali, Yunnan province as the empirical case, this study builds an analytical framework of rural landscape production with landscape as the observing object and with the total production theory as the theoretical basis. On this basis, this study adopts the methods of archival analysis and in-depth interviews with five times fieldwork in Shuanglang from November 2016 to October 2020. With these empirical materials, this study investigates the process and mechanism of Shuanglang's rural landscape reproduction under the background of art intervention from three dimensions, including landscape forms, landscape society, and landscape ideals. This study has three main conclusions. First, the study finds that the reproduction process of Shuanglang's rural landscape is essentially a process of rural development tending towards artification, modernization, and touristification. Second, the art intervention in rural development in this case has a full effect on the various structural aspects of such rural landscape, and has feedback on different levels of economy, politics, and culture. In view of this, this study believes that art intervention has become an opportunity for the development of Shuanglang.
曾莉, 吕光耀, 安宁. 艺术介入背景下的乡村景观再生产研究[J]. 人文地理, 2022, 37(4): 53-64.
ZENG Li, LV Guang-yao, AN Ning. RESEARCH ON THE REPRODUCTION OF RURAL LANDSCAPE UNDER THE BACKGROUND OF ART INTERVENTION. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 37(4): 53-64.
周彦华.艺术的介入——介入性艺术的审美意义生成机制[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2017:1. [Zhou Yanhua. Art Intervention: The Formation Mechanism of Aesthetic Meaning of Engaged Art [M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2017:1.]
[2]
周严,魏武,狄丞.公共艺术设计[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2017:5- 6. [Zhou Yan, Wei Wu, Di Cheng. Public Art Design[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2017:5-6.]
[3]
俞孔坚,吉庆萍.国际“城市美化运动” 之于中国的教训（上）——渊源、 内涵与蔓延[J].中国园林,2000,16(1):27-33. [Yu Kongjian, Ji Qingping. China to learn from the international "city beautiful movement"(A)[J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2000,16(1):27- 33.]
[4]
William H W. The City Beautiful Movement[M]. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989:76-78.
[5]
唐燕.文化、 创意产业与城市更新[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2016: 43-52. [Tang Yan. Culture, Creative Industries and Urban Regeneration[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2016:43-52.]
[6]
李牧“ . 人类学转向” 下当代艺术的文化逻辑[J].民族艺术,2020(1): 76-86. [Li Mu. The cultural logic of contemporary art under the "anthropological turn"[J]. National Arts, 2020(1):76-86.]
[7]
王春辰“ . 艺术介入社会”： 新敏感与再肯定[J].美术研究,2012(4): 25-30. [Wang Chunchen. "Art intervenes in society": Grasp opportunity and reaffirmation[J]. Art Research, 2012(4):25-30.]
[8]
庄诺亚,杨忍,陆进锋,等.艺术介入乡村： 两种乡村发展转型典型模式的多级效益比较分析[J]. 热带地理,2022,42(3):396- 408. [Zhuang Nuoya, Yang Ren, Lu Jinfeng, et al. Art intervention in rural areas: Comparative analysis of multi-level benefits of two typical modes in rural development transformation[J]. Tropical Geography, 2022,42(3):396-408.]
[9]
孙瑶,李险峰.公共艺术介入城市边缘社区的应用研究[J].现代城市研究,2018(5):109-114. [Sun Yao, Li Xianfeng. Study on the application of public art into urban fringe community[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2018(5):109-114.]
[10]
刘雨菡,张珊珊,鲍梓婷.艺术介入的社区营造与规划思考[J].规划师,2016,32(8):29-34. [Liu Yuhan, Zhang Shanshan, Bao Ziting. Art involved community creation and planning[J]. Planners, 2016,32(8): 29-34.]
[11]
黄诗雨,李险峰.艺术参与下的乡村空间重构[J].地理研究,2020, 39(3):709-720. [Huang Shiyu, Li Xianfeng. Reconstruction of rural space with art participation[J]. Geographical Research, 2020,39(3): 709-720.]
[12]
杨茜好,翁时秀.公共艺术介入乡村建设失效过程分析及影响机制研究——以云南省元阳阿者科村“哈尼娃” 为例[J].地理科学进展,2022,41(2):264-276. [Yang Xihao, Weng Shixiu. A case study of ineffective public art intervention in rural construction: Haniwa sculpture in Azheke village, Yuanyang country[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022,41(2):264-276.]
[13]
王儒化,张新安.马克思主义政治经济学辞典[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1992:32. [Wang Ruhua, Zhang Xin'an. Dictionary of Marx's Political Economy[M]. Beijing: Economic Press China, 1992:32.]
[14]
俞吾金.作为全面生产理论的马克思哲学[J].哲学研究,2003(8): 16-22,95. [Yu Wujin. Marx's philosophy as the theory of universal production[J]. Philosophical Research, 2003(8):16-22,95.]
[15]
邬焜.论马克思和恩格斯“全面生产” 理论的复杂性特征——对机械唯物史观的批判[J].中国人民大学学报,2006(6):86-92. [Wu Kun. On the complexity characteristic of theory of "overall produce" by Marx and Engels: Criticizing the mechanical materialist conception of history[J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2006(6):86-92.]
[16]
张兴.马克思哲学中的生产概念[D].武汉:武汉大学,2010:48-87. [Zhang Xing. The Concept of Production in Marx's Philosophy[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2010:48-87.]
[17]
马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集（第42卷）[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1979:121. [Marx K, Engels F. Karl Marx/ Friedrich Engels Collected Works (42)[M]. Central Compilation and Translation Bureau, trans. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1979:121.]
[18]
德波.景观社会[M].张新木,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2017:4,7,13- 24. [Debord G. La Société du Spectacle[M]. Zhang Xinmu, trans. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2017:4,7,13-24.]
[19]
向岚麟,吕斌.新文化地理学视角下的文化景观研究进展[J].人文地理,2010,25(6):7-13. [Xiang Lanlin, Lv Bin. Review on cultural landscape study in the perspective of new cultural geography[J]. Human Geography, 2010,25(6):7-13.]
[20]
Wylie J. Landscape[M]. New York: Routledge, 2007:55,63.
[21]
米切尔.W J T.风景与权力（第2版）[M].杨丽,万信琼,译.南京:译林出版社,2017:5-8. [Mitchell W J T. Landscape and Power[M]. Yang Li, Wan Xinqiong, trans. Nanjing: Yilin Press, 2017:5-8.]
[22]
俞孔坚.理想景观探源——风水的文化意义[M].北京:商务印书馆,2016:48. [Yu Kongjian. The Ideal Landscape: The Meanings of Feng-Shui[M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2016:48.]
[23]
计成.园冶[M].李世葵,刘金鹏,译.北京:中华书局,2011:109. [Ji Cheng. The Craft of Gardens[M]. Li Shikui, Liu Jinpeng, trans. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2011:109.]
[24]
叶凤成.浅议生产与消费的辩证关系[J].中共福建省委党校(福建行政学院)学报,1985(2):9-11. [Ye Fengcheng. Research on the dialectical relationship between production and consumption[J]. Journal of Fujian Provincial Committee Party School of CPC(Fujian Academy of Governance), 1985(2):9-11.]
[25]
索莱里,程绪珂,苏雪痕,等.生产性景观访谈[EB/OL].(2010-07-02) [2019-12-11]. http://www.chla.com.cn/html/c77/2010-07/59070.html. [Soleri P, Cheng Xuke, Su Xuehen, et al. The productive landscape interview[EB/OL]. (2010- 07- 02) [2019- 12- 11]. http://www.chla.com.cn/html/c77/2010-07/59070.html.]
[26]
石晗,张玺玲,张建国,等.国外生产性景观理论研究与应用情况[J]. 浙江农林科学,2015,56(3):352-355,361. [Shi Han, Zhang Xiling, Zhang Jianguo, et al. The research and application of productive landscape theory abroad[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015,56(3):352-355,361.]
[27]
杨政业.白族本主文化[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,1994:148-155. [Yang Zhengye. The Culture of the Local Deities of the Bai People [M]. Kunming: Yunnan People's Publishing House, 1994:148-155.]
[28]
Gorg C. Landscape governance: The "politics of scale" and the "natural" conditions of places[J]. Geoforum, 2007,38(5):954-966.
[29]
Leibenath M, Lintz G. Understanding "landscape governance": The case of wind energy landscape in Germany[J]. Landscape Research, 2018,43(4):476-488.
[30]
张锡禄.苍洱地区居址环境的历史变迁[J].环境科学导刊,1997,16(4):3-8. [Zhang Xilu. The historical changes of the habitation environment in the area of Cangshan Mountain and Erhai Lake[J]. Environmental Science Survey, 1997,16(4):3-8.]
[31]
周俊华,雷信来,赵金元.南诏大理国时期佛教密宗与白族先民政治生活的积极互动[J].大理学院学报,2011,10(9):1-5. [Zhou Junhua, Lei Xinlai, Zhao Jinyuan. Positive interaction in political life between Tantric Buddhism and Bai ancestors in Nanzhao and Dali Kingdom period[J]. Journal of Dali University, 2011,10(9):1-5.]
[32]
郝飞“ . 家与无家”： 大理旅居者的文化认同与地方依恋[D].泉州: 华侨大学,2015:1-3,48. [Hao Fei. "Home and Homelessness": The Cultural Identity and Place Attachment of Dali Sojourners[D]. Quanzhou: Huaqiao University, 2015:1-3,48.]
[33]
彭兆荣.重建中国乡土景观[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2018: 73,98. [Peng Zhaorong. Reconstructing Chinese Vernacular Landscape[M]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press, 2018:73,98.]
[34]
姜辽,雷熠雯,张洁.旅游引导文化产业空间审美修复的有效性研究[J]. 旅游学刊,2021,36(3):109- 117. [Jiang Liao, Lei Yiwen, Zhang Jie. A study on the effectiveness of tourism guiding the aesthetic restoration of cultural industry space[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2021,36(3):109-117.]
[35]
曾莉,唐雪琼.基于文化表征理论的传统村落景观意象研究—— 以云南双廊白族农民画为例[J].南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计), 2018(4):130-135. [Zeng Li, Tang Xueqiong. Research on landscape imagery of traditional villages based on cultural representation theory: A case study of farmer painting of the Bai nationality in Shuanglang of Yunnan[J]. Journal of Nanjing Arts Institute(Fine Arts & Design), 2018(4):130-135.]
[36]
黑格尔.美学[M].朱光潜,译.北京:商务印书馆,1997:6-7. [Hegel G W F. Aesthetics[M]. Zhu Guangqian, trans. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 1997:6-7.]
[37]
Murdoch J, Pratt A C. Rural studies: Modernism, postmodernism and the "post-rural"[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 1993,9(4):411-427.
[38]
Woods M. Rural geography: Blurring boundaries and making connections[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2009,33(6):849-858.
[39]
张园林,刘玉亭,马丁·菲利普斯.乡村空间转型研究的中西比较[J].城市发展研究,2021,28(11):53-61. [Zhang Yuanlin, Liu Yuting, Phillips M. Comparison between China and the West in the study of rural space transformation[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2021, 28(11):53-61.]
[40]
柴雪瑞,陶伟,卢俊.基于康泽恩形态学的传统村落物质形态的生成与演变——以傣族弄么村为例[J].人文地理,2022,37(1):90-99. [Chai Xuerui, Tao Wei, Lu Jun. Formation and evolution of traditional village material form based on Conzenian approach: A case study of Nongme village of Dai ethnic[J]. Human Geography, 2022, 37(1):90-99.]
